Team Ade/Quingco/Fremont

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings3 teams · SFV 55 & Over - 7.0 MxD

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Team Ade/Quingco/Fremont	0	0	0	0	0	0
2Get Smashed/Lula/CSUN	0	0	0	0	0	0
3Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67

Bruce Hofert

published 4

3.35

Ian Gocka

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.22

Wangie Pineda

published 3.5

3.19

Mark Gasper

published —

3.16

Gus Batista

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.16

Carrie Gasper

published 3.5

3.15

Jane Caldito

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.06

Elena Saydah

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

2.86

Deborah Anderson

published 3

2.83

Ade Quingco

published 3.5

2.82

Rosie Casillas

published —

—

Linda Matsumoto

published —

—

Pete Tapia

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Gasper + Ian Gocka	6–1	59% games	not enough data
Elena Saydah + Ian Gocka	3–0	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Bruce Hofert

58W–53L career · no lines in 2026

9%90%1%

3.67

3.5

Ian Gocka

54W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%87%12%

3.35

3.5

Wangie Pineda

96W–110L career · no lines in 2026

5%94%1%

3.22

—

Mark Gasper

4W–13L career · no lines in 2026

<1%7%93%

3.19

3.5

Gus Batista

2W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2026

10%89%<1%

3.16

3.5

Carrie Gasper

189W–211L career · no lines in 2026

11%88%<1%

3.16

3.5

Jane Caldito

102W–106L career · 1 line in 2026

13%87%<1%

3.15

3.5

Elena Saydah

123W–79L career · 1 line in 2026

32%68%<1%

3.06

Deborah Anderson

14W–11L career · no lines in 2026

<1%86%14%

2.86

3.5

Ade Quingco

0W–6L career · no lines in 2026

90%10%<1%

2.83

—

Rosie Casillas

6W–10L career · no lines in 2026

1%91%9%

2.82

—

Linda Matsumoto

1W–1L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Pete Tapia

1W–0L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.