Teams

Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo

2026 Mixed 55+ SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 7.0 MxD

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 27 2:00 PM
The Paseo Club
Oct 11 4:00 PM
The Paseo Club
Oct 18 3:00 PM
Fremont Park Tennis Center
Oct 31 11:00 AM
Northridge Racquet Sports California State University
Nov 8 4:00 PM
The Paseo Club
Nov 14 2:00 PM
The Paseo Club
2026-08-30vs Team Ade/Quingco/FremontLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Smith / Tracy HASBANIAN vs Ian Gocka / Elena Saydah6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJorge Perazzo / Kayla Smith vs Gus Batista / Jane Caldito2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMel Matibag / TANIA JANICEK vs Oscar Toscano / Adrienne Beauvois6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-22vs Get Smashed/Lula/CSUNLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Rochford / Renee Volpei vs Edmond Avedisian / Zenaida Siojo6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVenita Ryan / Philip Smith vs Tony Lujan / Gabrielle Shrier3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Tamondong / TANIA JANICEK vs Teri Gustafson / Scott Carrithers6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · SFV 55 & Over - 7.0 MxD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Ade/Quingco/Fremont000000
2Get Smashed/Lula/CSUN000000
3Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Margaret Chand
published 4
3.61
Frank Abt
published 4
3.52
Terri Admiraal
published 3.5
3.42
Leslie Vastano
published 3.5
3.39
Jacobus Admiraal
published
3.32
Renee Volpei
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Edward Hatch
published
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
John Rochford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Salisa Wagner
published 3.5
3.11
Jorge Perazzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Mel Matibag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Patrick Tamondong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Venita Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
John Chung
published
2.95
Tracy HASBANIAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laima Zbojniewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mel Matibag + Tracy HASBANIAN2840% gamesnot enough data
John Rochford + Renee Volpei224 matchesnot enough data
TANIA JANICEK + Mel Matibag134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margaret Chand
65W–60L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Frank Abt
114W–63L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Terri Admiraal
122W–87L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Leslie Vastano
86W–73L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jacobus Admiraal
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Renee Volpei
93W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Edward Hatch
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
John Rochford
52W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Salisa Wagner
66W–62L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jorge Perazzo
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mel Matibag
46W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Patrick Tamondong
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
John Chung
18W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Tracy HASBANIAN
18W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Laima Zbojniewicz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.