Teams

KY/LOU/ACKERMANN

2025 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Diana Gioia
published 4.5
4.18
Amy Gulledge
published 4.5
4.18
Carmen Schreiber
published 4.5
4.13
Jill Roby
published
4.11
Aimee Ackermann
published 4.5
4.09
Livia Aftenie
published
4.07
Karen Mueller
published
3.99
Karen Raby
published
3.95
Sarah Kane-Liu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Morgan Bauer
published
3.86
Kathleen Berghausen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Jody Shaikun
published
3.80
Rose Shuck
published
3.75
Denise Roby
published 4
3.69
Amanda Matter
published 4
3.65
Emily Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Tracey Risk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Mary Wallitsch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Ackermann + Karen Mueller2548% games−12.8% vs expected
Mary Wallitsch + Emily Schmidt4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diana Gioia
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.53
4.5
Amy Gulledge
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Carmen Schreiber
28W–24L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jill Roby
39W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
4.13
4.5
Aimee Ackermann
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Livia Aftenie
37W–28L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
Karen Mueller
32W–24L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Karen Raby
24W–22L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Sarah Kane-Liu
44W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Morgan Bauer
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
Kathleen Berghausen
27W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Jody Shaikun
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
Rose Shuck
10W–35L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Denise Roby
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Amanda Matter
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Emily Schmidt
29W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Tracey Risk
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mary Wallitsch
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.