Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-06vs Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesFlorita Labrador / Janet Race vs Betsy Kemp / Shannon Roecklein1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRosanne Kim / Florita Labrador vs Jennifer Cano / Kimberly Phillips7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Karlene Steelman
published
3.69
Heather Houston
published 4
3.62
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.54
Shannon Lynch
published
3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.38
Rosanne Kim
published
3.28
Janet Race
published
3.10
Caroline Hauck
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.94
Lourdes Alano
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.92
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
2.88
Gayle Millington
published 3
Kathleen Olson
published
Mary Akli
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daljeet Singh + Sanna Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karlene Steelman
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Shannon Lynch
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rosanne Kim
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Janet Race
9W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Caroline Hauck
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lourdes Alano
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kathleen Olson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.