Teams

BP RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-24vs GTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Kristin Holmquist vs Casey Rhine / Hanh Phi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs Julie McPherson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Swartwout / Leslie Lane vs Valerie Imperial / Katy Donnelly7-5, 6-2
2021-04-13vs NJ GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Alexandra Wingert vs Kim Melvin / Shannon Mooney7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennifer Swartwout vs Kimberly Bonczynski1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bolton / Hilaria Davis vs Caryn Moller / Megan Shibao7-6, 6-4
2021-04-10vs CP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Swartwout / Alexandra Wingert vs Belinda Nelson / Anna Jones3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-10vs RCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Bolton / Hilaria Davis vs Michele Gosselin / Nancy Broumpton2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Swartwout vs Sarah Campbell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Lane / Alexandra Wingert vs Nina Neill / Heather Wilson6-1, 6-1
2021-03-27vs NJ REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Leslie Lane vs Darcie Coy / Anne Steputis6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs Dori Webb4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Holmquist / Jennifer Swartwout vs Sandra Galvan / Amy Williams0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Leslie Lane
published
3.92
Hilaria Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Alexandra Wingert
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Swartwout
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.44
Kristin Holmquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Susan Bolton
published
Cheryl Scheck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Wingert + Leslie Lane3353% games−2.4% vs expected
Kristin Holmquist + Jennifer Swartwout1537% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Holmquist + Leslie Lane2341% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Lane
131W–68L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Hilaria Davis
137W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Alexandra Wingert
69W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jennifer Swartwout
29W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Kristin Holmquist
45W–54L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
Susan Bolton
63W–68L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
Cheryl Scheck
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.