Teams

GTC RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-24vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Rhine / Hanh Phi vs Hilaria Davis / Kristin Holmquist6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Imperial / Katy Donnelly vs Jennifer Swartwout / Leslie Lane5-7, 2-6
2021-04-10vs RCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCasey Rhine / Julia K Hall vs Sarah Campbell / Elisabeth Rosen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAli Elkins vs Michele Gosselin6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHanh Phi / Sarajane Goodfellow vs Nina Neill / Heather Wilson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-03vs NJ GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Julia K Hall vs Caryn Moller / Shannon Mooney6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAli Elkins vs Megan Shibao6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie McPherson / Valerie Imperial vs Kim Melvin / Solo Dogbeh6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-03-27vs CP GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesCasey Rhine vs Kim Chen5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Donnelly / Valerie Imperial vs Maia Hoffman / Heather Froehlich-Olmsted1-6, 4-6
2021-03-20vs NJ REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarajane Goodfellow / Hanh Phi vs Ann Stafford / Darcie Coy6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaty Donnelly / Valerie Imperial vs Sandra Galvan / Miki Aylesworth4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Ali Elkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Julia K Hall
published
3.59
Sarajane Goodfellow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Casey Rhine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.10
Valerie Imperial
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hanh Phi
published
Katy Donnelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Imperial + Katy Donnelly1837% games−3.3% vs expected
Sarajane Goodfellow + Hanh Phi1544% games−8.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Elkins
52W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
Julia K Hall
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Sarajane Goodfellow
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Casey Rhine
31W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Valerie Imperial
103W–103L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
Hanh Phi
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Katy Donnelly
29W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.