Teams

GRRC - Turbeville

2026 Tri Level 40 and Above · Mens 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs Kinston RecWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Quincy Edwards vs Sviatoslav Archava / Aaron Yarus6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatt Turbeville / Mark Gerhart vs Jeremy Jones / Graham Toler3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Casteen / Brock Felton vs James Sylvia / Robert Whitley6-4, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Kinston RecLost 12
L#1 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Carl Copeland vs Sviatoslav Archava / Aaron Yarus3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Taylor / Matt Turbeville vs Jeremy Jones / Graham Toler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrock Felton / Steve Renfrow vs Robert Whitley / Jeff Gravelin6-3, 6-0
2026-02-28vs Kinston RecLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarl Copeland / Stephen Reams vs Aaron Yarus / Sviatoslav Archava6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Jones / Mark Gerhart vs Graham Toler / Jeremy Jones3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGregory Johnson / Matthew Casteen vs Robert Whitley / Jeff Gravelin6-3, 6-3
2026-02-28vs Kinston RecWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Stephen Reams vs Aaron Yarus / Sviatoslav Archava6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGregory Johnson / Brock Felton vs James Sylvia / Jeff Gravelin6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mens 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GRRC - Turbeville22661294
2Kinston Rec226615118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Courtney Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Carl Copeland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Quincy Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Stephen Reams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Brock Felton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Matt Turbeville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Mark Gerhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Matthew Casteen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Renfrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quincy Edwards + Courtney Harrell134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Reams + Courtney Harrell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Harrell
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Carl Copeland
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Quincy Edwards
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
Stephen Reams
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.81
3.5
Brock Felton
27W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Matt Turbeville
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mark Gerhart
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
Matthew Casteen
34W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Steve Renfrow
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.