Teams

SD LT Balboa sTRIngers/ Edwards

2024 Mixed Doubles Tri-Level Fall- SD · SD LT (8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-09vs SD LL2 LT SDTRC/ AdamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Kaprielian / Candace Gyure vs Richard Schwab / Jennifer Brady3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBea Vega / Raghu Shettigar vs Anthony Reyes / Paola Romo2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Gyure / Michael Speck vs Gina White / Samuel Orozco3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Morris / Michael Chaiwimol vs Joseph Reyes / Brenda Henriquez3-6, 1-6
2024-10-24vs SD LT Peninsula Princesses/ NguyenLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Yzaguirre / Michael Chaiwimol vs Nick Johnson / Kristine Nguyen4-6, 6-7
2024-10-12vs SD LT Balboa/ MubarakWon 10
W#2 DoublesBen LoBrutto / Candace Gyure vs Ryan Rosenberg / Annie Kyle6-1, 6-1
2024-09-14vs SD LL2 LT SDTRC/ AdamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlbert Alagata / Bea Vega vs Damon Brady / Jennifer Brady7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD LT (8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Laura Edmondson
published
3.76
Albert Alagata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Raghu Shettigar
published
3.58
Becky Yzaguirre
published 4
3.49
Ben LoBrutto
published 3.5
3.27
Bea Vega
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Michael Speck
published
3.01
Candace Gyure
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Carol Morris
published 3.5
2.73
Michael Chaiwimol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Cathy Edwards
published 3
Linda Olson
published
Miguel Renteria
published
Patrick Mallory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Alagata + Bea Vega181553% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Edmondson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Albert Alagata
30W–18L career · type M · 1 line in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Raghu Shettigar
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Becky Yzaguirre
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ben LoBrutto
12W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Bea Vega
154W–161L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Michael Speck
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Candace Gyure
128W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Carol Morris
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Michael Chaiwimol
45W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cathy Edwards
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Linda Olson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miguel Renteria
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Mallory
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.