Teams

Sandy Springs (Mary Kimberl)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-01-04vs USTA Atlanta/Laura MoranLost 14
L#1 DoublesAnnette Harlow / Joanne Deangelo vs Elizabeth Edgar / Katie Schaufler1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTiara McClain vs Paige Sanders0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBethany Vincent / Mila Mailed vs Rebecca Markusson / Ashley Reagin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJan Hartzfeld / Lesley Satterlee vs Brooke Lewis / Makenzie Hayes0-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesMary Kimberl / Allison Kelly vs Yessica Alicea / Judy Kuo3-6, 6-3, 7-6
2024-12-14vs Carl Sanders (Laura Booth)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesJoanne Deangelo / Annette Harlow vs Julia Doyle / Kristin Traina6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMila Mailed vs Deanna Knieriem4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Thurman / Irina Tyx vs Kirstyn Galgon / Rachel West Jones7-5, 4-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Kelly / Mary Kimberl vs Lyn McCool / Stefanie Paulos6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesDeborah Ransome / Lesley Satterlee vs Joanne Carabillo / Cristel Collard3-6, 4-6
2024-11-23vs Bitsy Grant (Sarah Gaudry)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesJoanne Deangelo / Annette Harlow vs Becca Owens / Monica Morgan5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTiara McClain vs Thien-Kim Le2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Thurman / Mila Mailed vs Keenan Whitesides / Morgan Tolley5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Kelly / Mary Kimberl vs Ellen Li / Bree Robinson6-4, 6-1
W#4 DoublesLesley Satterlee / Irina Tyx vs Gail Wood / Nicole Ramseur6-3, 6-3
2024-11-16vs Sandy Springs (Christina Abrams)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesCarol Thurman / Deborah Ransome vs Virginia Morgan / Charlotte Disley2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesIrina Tyx vs Lauren Crites3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kimberl / Allison Kelly vs Carlyle Yealy / Catherine Yealy2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJan Hartzfeld / Bethany Vincent vs Cristina Abreu / Jillian Connors1-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesAnnette Harlow / Tiara McClain vs Anna Houseman / Christina Abrams7-6, 6-3
2024-11-09vs Georgetown (Jennifer Fenmore)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesAnnette Harlow / Carol Thurman vs Fara Yarbrough / Marnie Kalil-Marra4-6, 6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTiara McClain vs Angie Horton6-4, 4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Kelly / Sarah Hensley vs Kelly Landry / Rachel Christie2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJan Hartzfeld / Angel Roddy vs Sandra Burnett / Kathryn Zlotnick6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Mary Kimberl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Annette Harlow
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Jan Hartzfeld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Dana Graham
published 4
3.70
Carol Thurman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Joanne Deangelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Angel Roddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Mila Mailed
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.52
Tiara McClain
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Deborah Ransome
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Bethany Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Roseann Colasante
published
3.32
Lesley Satterlee
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Irina Tyx
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Eder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Deangelo + Annette Harlow3351% games+0.7% vs expected
Joanne Deangelo + Jan Hartzfeld5066% gamesnot enough data
Carol Thurman + Deborah Ransome3254% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kimberl + Jan Hartzfeld404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kimberl
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Annette Harlow
38W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Jan Hartzfeld
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dana Graham
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Carol Thurman
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Joanne Deangelo
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Angel Roddy
90W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Mila Mailed
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Tiara McClain
32W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Deborah Ransome
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Bethany Vincent
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Roseann Colasante
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Lesley Satterlee
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Irina Tyx
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Hensley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Eder
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.