Teams

USTA Atlanta/Laura Moran

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-15vs Carl Sanders (Laura Booth)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesBrooke Lewis / Jessica Roberts vs Cristel Collard / Julia Doyle6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBobbi Ernst vs Jenna Green1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMacKenzie Moore / KELLY MORRISON vs Kirstyn Galgon / Andrea Crase6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesOlivia Gray / Makenzie Hayes vs Joanne Carabillo / Kristin Buhay7-5, 6-3
W#4 DoublesKristin Gettys / Ashley Reagin vs Monica Rizzo / Sarah Grace Lyndale6-1, 6-3
2025-01-04vs Sandy Springs (Mary Kimberl)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Edgar / Katie Schaufler vs Annette Harlow / Joanne Deangelo6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPaige Sanders vs Tiara McClain6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Markusson / Ashley Reagin vs Bethany Vincent / Mila Mailed6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Lewis / Makenzie Hayes vs Jan Hartzfeld / Lesley Satterlee6-0, 6-0
L#4 DoublesYessica Alicea / Judy Kuo vs Mary Kimberl / Allison Kelly6-3, 3-6, 6-7
2024-12-14vs Bitsy Grant (Sarah Gaudry)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesRebecca Markusson / Judy Kuo vs Becca Owens / Keenan Whitesides5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMargot Melchiode vs Thien-Kim Le2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Roberts / Kristin Gettys vs Ellen Li / Tamara Rogers6-3, 1-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesOlivia Gray / Sarah Gricius vs Morgan Tolley / Gail Wood6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesShelly Gary / Shelby Slauer vs Faye Wu / Rachel Zimmerman7-6, 6-2
2024-12-07vs Sandy Springs (Christina Abrams)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Gricius / Shelby Slauer vs Laine Hartman / Kealy Hartman5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPaige Sanders vs Erica Fontaine6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Mcpheely / Katie Schaufler vs Jayme Merriam / Charlotte Disley5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBobbi Ernst / Tracy Preston vs Carlyle Yealy / Anna Houseman7-6, 6-1
L#4 DoublesYessica Alicea / Laura Moran vs Christina Abrams / Lauren Crites1-6, 4-6
2024-11-23vs Georgetown (Jennifer Fenmore)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesOlivia Gray / Jessica Roberts vs Rachel Christie / Melissa Reynolds3-6, 6-2, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPaige Sanders vs Angie Horton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKELLY MORRISON / Katie Schaufler vs Lisa Walker / Fara Yarbrough6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Moran / Shelby Slauer vs Lane Limroth / Blythe Martinson6-2, 6-2
L#4 DoublesMacKenzie Moore / Tracy Preston vs Jennifer Fenmore / Leslie Freymann6-0, 1-6, 4-6
2024-11-16vs Piedmont Park (Jessica McGowan)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Edgar / Olivia Gray vs Kyoung Lee / Meghann Gibbons7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Mcpheely vs Jordan Harbin2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Sanders / Sarah Gricius vs Kelly Lindquist Fojas / Shimley Reynolds6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShelly Gary / Margot Melchiode vs Sutton Boling / Nicole Liddon1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesBobbi Ernst / Tracy Preston vs Victoria Brock / Laurentia Soedarto7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Paige Sanders
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.07
Katie Schaufler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Makenzie Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
KELLY MORRISON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Elizabeth Edgar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Kristin Gettys
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Olivia Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Sarah Gricius
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Rebecca Markusson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Brooke Lewis
published 4
3.74
Bobbi Ernst
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
MacKenzie Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Megan Mcpheely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.73
Shelby Slauer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Tracy Preston
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Judy Kuo
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Jessica Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Margot Melchiode
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Ashley Reagin
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Yessica Alicea
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Moran
published
Shelly Gary
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Edgar + Katie Schaufler13266% games+13.3% vs expected
Olivia Gray + Jessica Roberts5161% games+10.0% vs expected
MacKenzie Moore + KELLY MORRISON2349% games+2.4% vs expected
KELLY MORRISON + Ashley Reagin6453% games−1.7% vs expected
Rebecca Markusson + KELLY MORRISON4260% gamesnot enough data
Judy Kuo + Katie Schaufler404 matchesnot enough data
Judy Kuo + Yessica Alicea123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Moran + Yessica Alicea303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Sanders
29W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
4.25
Katie Schaufler
26W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.07
Makenzie Hayes
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
KELLY MORRISON
38W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Elizabeth Edgar
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Kristin Gettys
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Olivia Gray
18W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
Sarah Gricius
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Rebecca Markusson
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Brooke Lewis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bobbi Ernst
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
MacKenzie Moore
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Megan Mcpheely
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Shelby Slauer
43W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Tracy Preston
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Judy Kuo
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Jessica Roberts
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Margot Melchiode
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Ashley Reagin
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Yessica Alicea
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Laura Moran
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Gary
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.