Teams

UPTA40A/Jain/Independent

2025 UPTA Adult 40 & Over - USTA · 40 Adult Women - 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-07vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Rhonda Watson vs Sandy Gillis / Elizabeth Clark6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTara Walters / Kelly Hesketh vs Harriet Pollitzer / Jodi Pfile6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichele Jain / Sara Hudgens vs Jennifer Shivers / Jill Norman6-0, 6-2
2025-04-06vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Shannon Chase vs Brenda Fisher / Elizabeth Clark7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Tara Walters vs Sandy Gillis / Harriet Pollitzer7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDorie Fann / Kelly Hesketh vs Paige Cummings / Michele Archibald7-6, 6-4
2025-04-05vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Watson / Liza Feniger vs Michele Archibald / Harriet Pollitzer6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Christi Brown vs Paige Cummings / Brenda Fisher6-3, 6-4
2025-04-05vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Lides Withrow vs Paige Cummings / Elizabeth Clark6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Field / Kelly Hesketh vs Sandy Gillis / Jodi Pfile6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTara Walters / Mary Paylor vs Jill Norman / Jennifer Shivers6-1, 6-4
2025-04-05vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 30
W#1 DoublesTara Walters / Megan Field vs Elizabeth Clark / Harriet Pollitzer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Watson / Lides Withrow vs Sandy Gillis / Jennifer Shivers6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Mary Paylor vs Jodi Pfile / Janet Driscoll6-1, 6-2
2025-04-04vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Dorie Fann vs Brenda Fisher / Jodi Pfile6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Hayduk / Megan Field vs Michele Archibald / Elizabeth Clark6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Walters / Julianne Foster vs Paige Cummings / Sandy Gillis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-04vs UPTA40A/Archibald/HHIWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiza Feniger / Dorie Fann vs Michele Archibald / Paige Cummings6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRhonda Watson / Christi Brown vs Janet Driscoll / Jennifer Shivers6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Adult Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Mary Paylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Lides Withrow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Sara Hudgens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Kelly Hesketh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Megan Field
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Rhonda Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Tara Walters
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Carol Hayduk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.87
Liza Feniger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Michele Jain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Dorie Fann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Julianne Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Fite
published
Shannon Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorie Fann + Liza Feniger3355% gamesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Rhonda Watson134 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Watson + Liza Feniger404 matchesnot enough data
Dorie Fann + Kelly Hesketh404 matchesnot enough data
Tara Walters + Mary Paylor314 matchesnot enough data
Michele Jain + Julianne Foster134 matchesnot enough data
Sara Hudgens + Liza Feniger303 matchesnot enough data
Carol Hayduk + Dorie Fann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Paylor
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Lides Withrow
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Sara Hudgens
16W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
Kelly Hesketh
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Megan Field
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Rhonda Watson
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Tara Walters
17W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Carol Hayduk
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Liza Feniger
21W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Michele Jain
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.80
Dorie Fann
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Julianne Foster
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
Leslie Fite
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Chase
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.