Teams

Soleil (Charles O'Mahoney)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Men · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-31vs Westchester (Peter Johnson)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Hume / Douglas Starr vs Patrick Matarrese / Bruce Spegal7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTom Baker / Charles Lampman vs Thomas Seo / William Price6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMarty Spellman / Richard Cheap vs Al Kolesar / William Misbach3-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs Kennworth (Jon Torblaa)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDouglas Starr / Charles Lampman vs Bill Pugh / Lawrence Cates6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephen Englebert / Rob Kraus vs Randolph Dye / Thomas Hooper3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCharles O'Mahoney / Larry Shaffer vs Terry Messer / James Sims4-6, 6-7
2025-10-17vs Vickery (John Jamieson)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCraig Hume / Charles Lampman vs Bill Daniel / Ray Wright3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRob Kraus / Bruce Hinkley vs Joseph McCann / Bill McClintock6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-10vs Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Hume / Charles O'Mahoney vs Bob Neinken / Bruce Levitt6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Healey / Marty Spellman vs Michael Larimer / Stanley Joffe1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRob Kraus / Stephen Englebert vs Brian Bradley / Edward Kanner6-1, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Harrison TC (Leroy Emkin)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesCharles O'Mahoney / Charles Lampman vs Ronald Rubel / Robert Eastlake2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Cheap / Bruce Hinkley vs Leroy Emkin / Steve Byrne6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRob Kraus / Stephen Englebert vs Walter Brill / Bill Moxley6-1, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Bridgemill (Neil Paauwe)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Hume / Charles O'Mahoney vs Robert Elliott / Russ Gresham6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Healey / Stephen Englebert vs Jeff Bailey / James Kirk4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Lampman / Larry Shaffer vs Jeff Bessa / Terry McCain6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kennworth (Jon Torblaa)*6014411134
2USTA Atlanta/Jim Caldwell5114410118
3Deer Lake (Greg Jones)*4213512148
4USTA Atlanta/Steven Thomas4210817156
5Vickery (John Jamieson)*4210818154
6Soleil (Charles O'Mahoney)*2481020155
7Bridgemill (Neil Paauwe)*249920160
8Blackburn (Bob Cleary)*2481022174
9Westchester (Peter Johnson)*2481024173
10Four Seasons (Eugene Goedtke)*1531530199
11Harrison TC (Leroy Emkin)*0621633200
12River Club (Russ Deluca)*0611735223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Craig Hume
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Charles Lampman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
William Healey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Charles O'Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Rob Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Stephen Englebert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Douglas Starr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Bruce Hinkley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Larry Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Richard Cheap
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Marty Spellman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Englebert + Rob Kraus12167% games+16.2% vs expected
Charles O'Mahoney + Douglas Starr3453% games+4.4% vs expected
Tom Baker + Charles Lampman4346% games−1.2% vs expected
Charles O'Mahoney + Craig Hume4549% games−4.1% vs expected
Charles Lampman + Craig Hume2448% games−10.5% vs expected
Charles Lampman + Bruce Hinkley5166% gamesnot enough data
Marty Spellman + Richard Cheap2338% gamesnot enough data
Larry Shaffer + Charles O'Mahoney134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Hume
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Charles Lampman
24W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
William Healey
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Charles O'Mahoney
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Rob Kraus
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Stephen Englebert
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Douglas Starr
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Bruce Hinkley
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Larry Shaffer
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Richard Cheap
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Marty Spellman
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Tom Baker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.