Teams

Olde Towne (Michael Larimer)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Men · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-31vs Kennworth (Jon Torblaa)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Larimer / Brian Bradley vs Randolph Dye / Thomas Hooper6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoe Marks / Frank Rannou vs Lawrence Cates / Craig Garrettson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBob Neinken / Stanley Joffe vs Terry Messer / James Sims4-6, 3-6
2025-10-24vs Vickery (John Jamieson)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBruce Levitt / Bob Neinken vs James Lyons / John Jamieson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNeil Schor / Robert Scaringe vs Bill Daniel / Tim Allaway3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichael Larimer / Stanley Joffe vs Ray Wright / Joseph McCann6-3, 7-6
2025-10-10vs Soleil (Charles O'Mahoney)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBob Neinken / Bruce Levitt vs Craig Hume / Charles O'Mahoney7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Larimer / Stanley Joffe vs William Healey / Marty Spellman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Bradley / Edward Kanner vs Rob Kraus / Stephen Englebert1-6, 2-6
2025-10-03vs Harrison TC (Leroy Emkin)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesBob Neinken / Neil Schor vs Ronald Rubel / L Hill Griffin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce Levitt / Brian Bradley vs Robert Eastlake / Steve Byrne6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoe Marks / Greg Foss vs Pat Kirkpatrick / George Morgan6-0, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Bridgemill (Neil Paauwe)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesBob Neinken / Neil Schor vs David Ball / Russ Gresham5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesStanley Joffe / Michael Larimer vs Jeff Bailey / Kevin Magnuson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Bradley / Edward Kanner vs Terry McCain / Larry Swan6-4, 6-0
2025-09-19vs Westchester (Peter Johnson)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesBob Neinken / Mike Storno vs William Misbach / Thomas Seo7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Larimer / Stanley Joffe vs William Price / Bruce Spegal7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesOdie Cohen / Joe Marks vs Todd Folk / Dennis Latora6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Bob Neinken
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Stanley Joffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Terence Furness
published
3.31
Robert Scaringe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Frank Rannou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Michael Larimer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Bruce Levitt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Ken Rutledge
published
3.17
Brian Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Joe Marks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Neil Schor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Mike Storno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Odie Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Greg Foss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Edward Kanner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Foss + Terence Furness10266% games+14.4% vs expected
Brian Bradley + Michael Larimer11239% games+1.6% vs expected
Michael Larimer + Stanley Joffe181252% games+0.7% vs expected
Joe Marks + Stanley Joffe5254% games−0.4% vs expected
Brian Bradley + Stanley Joffe2638% games−1.0% vs expected
Brian Bradley + Ken Rutledge4645% games−1.3% vs expected
Stanley Joffe + Robert Scaringe2544% games−2.3% vs expected
Neil Schor + Terence Furness16860% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bob Neinken
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Stanley Joffe
45W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Terence Furness
60W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Robert Scaringe
19W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Frank Rannou
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Michael Larimer
31W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Bruce Levitt
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Ken Rutledge
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Brian Bradley
21W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Joe Marks
67W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Neil Schor
145W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Mike Storno
5W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Odie Cohen
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Greg Foss
79W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Edward Kanner
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.