Teams

GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A

2022 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kelly Stiles
published
Adrienne Ladd
published 4
3.66
Evelyn Armstrong
published 4
3.62
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.56
Sally Brien
published
3.47
Heidi Young
published 4
3.40
Anne Kavanagh
published 3.5
3.33
Martha Ehrenfeld
published
3.28
Paula Mangin
published
3.25
Amy Jang
published 3.5
3.23
Janet Arnesty
published
3.12
Mary Anne Ruyle
published
Janis Porto
published
Karen Forsthoff
published
Margaret Stevenson
published
Susan Vollmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Armstrong + Kelly Stiles134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Stiles
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adrienne Ladd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Evelyn Armstrong
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Sally Brien
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Heidi Young
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Anne Kavanagh
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Martha Ehrenfeld
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
Paula Mangin
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Amy Jang
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Janet Arnesty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
Mary Anne Ruyle
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Janis Porto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Forsthoff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Stevenson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Vollmer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.