Teams

Grand Dames

2024 55&Over Women · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-14vs Western: Street BallersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Banks / Maria Lirio vs June Brennan / Nancy Wingerter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Abels / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Teresa Arena / Jan Coleman1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Jane Early vs Linda Capenhurst / Jean Jurek6-0, 6-3
2024-08-07vs Western: Street BallersLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Banks / Jane Early vs Rowena de Perio / Silva Banboukian Serghany4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Karen Hughes / Nancy Rehak6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSally Abell / Katalin Mechtler vs Linda Capenhurst / Jean Jurek4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-31vs Western: Street BallersLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Abell / Katalin Mechtler vs Michele McGrath / Jan Coleman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaura McKenna-Rossow / Audrey Cohn vs Karen Hughes / Julie Cimorelli6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Linda Capenhurst / Jean Jurek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-24vs Western: Street BallersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Maura McKenna-Rossow vs Teresa Arena / Michele McGrath5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Banks / Jane Early vs Rowena de Perio / Silva Banboukian Serghany4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Sally Abell vs June Brennan / Claudia Smolinski1-6, 6-7
2024-07-17vs Western: Street BallersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Sally Abell vs Michele McGrath / Carol Salvatore3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Lirio / Helen Marlette vs Nancy Rehak / Claudia Smolinski6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Silva Banboukian Serghany / Karen Hughes3-6, 3-6
2024-06-26vs Western: Street BallersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Maura McKenna-Rossow vs Carol Salvatore / Michele McGrath5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSally Abell / Audrey Cohn vs Nancy Rehak / Nancy Wingerter6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Lirio / Helen Marlette vs Linda Capenhurst / Jean Jurek7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Street Ballers5112615158
2Grand Dames1561227183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Maura McKenna-Rossow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Jane Early
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Sally Abell
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.38
Katalin Mechtler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Kathleen Banks
published
Helen Marlette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Andrea Abels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lemore OHANRAHAN
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Lisa Abeyounis
published
Maria Lirio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary-Ann Jolley
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Abeyounis + Audrey Cohn6357% games+6.4% vs expected
Mary-Ann Jolley + Katalin Mechtler6256% games+3.5% vs expected
Sally Abell + Katalin Mechtler1445% games+0.5% vs expected
Kathleen Banks + Katalin Mechtler191946% games−2.1% vs expected
Andrea Abels + Mary-Ann Jolley11357% games−5.3% vs expected
Mary-Ann Jolley + Helen Marlette4155% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Abels + Katalin Mechtler044 matchesnot enough data
Mary-Ann Jolley + Jane Early134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maura McKenna-Rossow
30W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jane Early
71W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Sally Abell
100W–81L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Katalin Mechtler
178W–123L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathleen Banks
87W–94L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Helen Marlette
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Abels
39W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lemore OHANRAHAN
46W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Abeyounis
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Lirio
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary-Ann Jolley
107W–93L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.