Teams

NWW-Bradner

2025 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs Yifan's teamWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Artati / Meghan Bradner vs Linh Hoang / Amy Li6-1, 6-1
2025-07-20vs GoeWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bradner / Christie Cabrera vs Jayme Hattrup / Reilly Ochs6-0, 6-0
2025-07-13vs BarnestoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristie Cabrera / Catherine Pidgeon vs Molly Featherstone / Tiffany Barnes6-0, 6-2
2025-06-22vs MorseLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristie Cabrera / Catherine Pidgeon vs Lizzy Feng / Sabrina Lu6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-08vs Over ServedWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bradner / Christie Cabrera vs Joia Poort / Sibylle Brown6-1, 6-1
2025-06-07vs Toil and TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bradner / Catherine Pidgeon vs Dana Day / Vera Makianich6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings27 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pink Pony Girls6060027
2NWW-Mundt6060236
3NWW-Higgins5151243
4NWW-Bradner5151218
5Untouchaballs (Flexible)4141331
6EDG-Lee-OneDoubles (Flexible)4141337
7Hu/Yang4141438
8Doubles Fun4242864
9Summer Sets (Flexible)3232449
10Lemonade3232541
11Apres Tennis3232646
12Hits and Giggles-Sei3333652
13Volleys and Vino3333655
14Toil and Trouble3333651
15Meiser (Flexible)3333761
16Tennis 4ever3333754
17Let's Talk About Sets (Flexible)2323643
18InnerGame2323642
19Lovejoy2424861
20Le Patisserie2424968
21Yifan's team2424964
22PITRA-HORN (Flexible)1414850
23Summer Ballers (Flexible)1414955
24Baby got backhand1515961
25Volley Ranchers15151171
26Serving Summer06061273
27Barnestone06061271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Christie Cabrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Stephanie Artati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Meghan Bradner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Catherine Pidgeon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Cabrera + Meghan Bradner9465% games+12.9% vs expected
Meghan Bradner + Stephanie Artati3255% games+8.6% vs expected
Christie Cabrera + Stephanie Artati303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christie Cabrera
40W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Stephanie Artati
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Meghan Bradner
55W–39L career · 11 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Catherine Pidgeon
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.