Teams

OSRC:Overserved/Potter:Potter

2026 ECT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesJacqui Mullally / Philippa Mannino vs Catherine Dinauer / Deborah Montenegro3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Goletz / Nancy Eastwood vs Mary Glidden / Celia Ponvert6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Schumann / Rebecca Coffey vs Karen Anthony Park / Jennifer Young5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-15vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Susan Potter vs Josie Jordan / Beth Pye6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Hefter / Svetlana Goletz vs Camille Burlingham / Lisa Belliveau3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDennise Antonio / Ann Wright vs Kim de Matteo / Laurie Zrenda4-6, 4-6
2026-01-18vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqui Mullally / Carolyn Caldwell vs Dana Johnson / Carolyn Fox-Robertson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Eastwood / Svetlana Goletz vs Connie Hurtt / Roisin MacKey5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Ann Wright vs Josie Jordan / Patricia Conway6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAnn Wright / Beverly Costello vs Kate Piironen / Debbie Kelly3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Schumann / Mary Ann Moran vs Wendy Chicosky / Deborah Montenegro6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDennise Antonio / Linda Cantley vs Karen Anthony Park / Amy Blume5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesRuthanne Rothman / Philippa Mannino vs Celia Ponvert / Tanya Flynn6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Schumann / Nancy Eastwood vs Maureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Wright / Paula Passarello vs Kate Piironen / Deborah Montenegro1-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Goletz / Ruthanne Rothman vs Connie Hurtt / Carolyn Fox-Robertson6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Nancy Eastwood vs Lisa Belliveau / Kim de Matteo6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Hefter / Carolyn Caldwell vs Beth Pye / Patricia Conway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-12vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Jacqui Mullally vs Connie Hurtt / Roisin MacKey1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Cantley / Kathy Pavelcak vs Carolyn Fox-Robertson / Anne Luner1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Mary Ann Moran vs Lisa Belliveau / Kim de Matteo2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesJacqui Mullally / Beverly Costello vs Maureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Cantley / Kathy Pavelcak vs Amy Blume / Susan Dellenbaugh6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaula Passarello / Rebecca Coffey vs Wendy Chicosky / Suzanne Black1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham0816821201
2GF:Kiss My Ace Fall 2025:Goodrich/Black08111328209
3OSRC:Overserved/Potter:Potter0891533226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Philippa Mannino
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Kathy Pavelcak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ruthanne Rothman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jacqui Mullally
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Svetlana Goletz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Nancy Eastwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Hefter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Beverly Costello
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.14
Mary Ann Moran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Carolyn Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Linda Cantley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.97
Nancy Schumann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Rebecca Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Dennise Antonio
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Paula Passarello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Costello + Carolyn Caldwell7555% games+8.8% vs expected
Mary Ann Moran + Nancy Schumann3353% games+8.4% vs expected
Susan Potter + Beverly Costello15358% games+5.7% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Philippa Mannino231852% games+4.9% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Philippa Mannino5849% games+4.4% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Mary Ann Moran61244% games+3.4% vs expected
Nancy Eastwood + Nancy Schumann12756% games+2.9% vs expected
Susan Potter + Carolyn Caldwell4552% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philippa Mannino
62W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kathy Pavelcak
67W–90L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Ruthanne Rothman
18W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jacqui Mullally
65W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Svetlana Goletz
47W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Nancy Eastwood
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anne Hefter
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Beverly Costello
76W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Mary Ann Moran
47W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carolyn Caldwell
52W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Linda Cantley
59W–45L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Nancy Schumann
78W–87L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.97
Rebecca Coffey
58W–85L career · 8 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Dennise Antonio
47W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Paula Passarello
26W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Potter
54W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.