Teams

GF:Kiss My Ace Fall 2025:Goodrich/Black

2026 ECT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs OSRC:Overserved/Potter:PotterLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Dinauer / Deborah Montenegro vs Jacqui Mullally / Philippa Mannino6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Glidden / Celia Ponvert vs Svetlana Goletz / Nancy Eastwood4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Anthony Park / Jennifer Young vs Nancy Schumann / Rebecca Coffey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-08vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer vs Lisa Belliveau / Camille Burlingham6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Jennifer Young vs Kathleen Kenyon / Dana Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Flynn / Dani Woods vs Beth Pye / Patricia Conway3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-02-01vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly vs Carolyn Fox-Robertson / Donna Sullivan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDani Woods / Suzanne Black vs Josie Jordan / Laurie Zrenda2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-11vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Piironen / Deborah Montenegro vs Cathy Landers / Camille Burlingham3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Dana Johnson / Donna Sullivan6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Young / Wendy Chicosky vs Roisin MacKey / Anne Luner0-6, 1-6
2026-01-04vs OSRC:Overserved/Potter:PotterWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Piironen / Debbie Kelly vs Ann Wright / Beverly Costello6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Deborah Montenegro vs Nancy Schumann / Mary Ann Moran2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Anthony Park / Amy Blume vs Dennise Antonio / Linda Cantley7-5, 6-4
2025-12-14vs LS:Set 2 Win!:BurlinghamLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Dinauer / Maureen Goodrich vs Roisin MacKey / Connie Hurtt7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Blume / Leanne Jolin vs Donna Sullivan / Kathleen Kenyon2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Dellenbaugh / Suzanne Black vs Camille Burlingham / Cathy Landers2-6, 1-6
2025-11-16vs OSRC:Overserved/Potter:PotterWon 21
L#1 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Tanya Flynn vs Ruthanne Rothman / Philippa Mannino0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer vs Nancy Schumann / Nancy Eastwood6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKate Piironen / Deborah Montenegro vs Ann Wright / Paula Passarello6-1, 6-1
2025-10-05vs OSRC:Overserved/Potter:PotterWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer vs Jacqui Mullally / Beverly Costello6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Blume / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Linda Cantley / Kathy Pavelcak2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Suzanne Black vs Paula Passarello / Rebecca Coffey6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:Set 2 Win!:Burlingham0816821201
2GF:Kiss My Ace Fall 2025:Goodrich/Black08111328209
3OSRC:Overserved/Potter:Potter0891533226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Celia Ponvert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Dani Woods
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Maureen Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Wendy Chicosky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Catherine Dinauer
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.33
Kate Piironen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Deborah Montenegro
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Debbie Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Leanne Jolin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Amy Blume
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Suzanne Black
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Tanya Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Mary Glidden
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jane Braum
published
Jennifer Young
published
Karen Anthony Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Dellenbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Toni Rivera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Dinauer + Maureen Goodrich9062% games+8.6% vs expected
Catherine Dinauer + Kate Piironen6163% games+6.4% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Kate Piironen12956% games+5.6% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Maureen Goodrich4266% games+3.6% vs expected
Kate Piironen + Leanne Jolin3255% games+2.9% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Catherine Dinauer13656% games+2.5% vs expected
Celia Ponvert + Suzanne Black6162% games+2.5% vs expected
Maureen Goodrich + Debbie Kelly11755% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celia Ponvert
172W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Dani Woods
138W–122L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Maureen Goodrich
130W–67L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Wendy Chicosky
56W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Catherine Dinauer
98W–73L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.33
Kate Piironen
66W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Deborah Montenegro
75W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Debbie Kelly
66W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
Leanne Jolin
39W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Blume
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Suzanne Black
82W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tanya Flynn
103W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Mary Glidden
27W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Jane Braum
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Young
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Anthony Park
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Dellenbaugh
38W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Toni Rivera
46W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.