Teams

Fuller-Luna/Knoxville

2025 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-02vs KnoxHall40Won 21
W#1 DoublesRosa Luttrell / Natalie Deel vs Kimberly Woody / Rita Thome7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCorrena Dickson / Emily Elison vs Lauren Hall / Amber Davis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Collins / Margot Dunn vs Liz Mcclain / Marissa Turner3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lori Thompson
published
3.79
Laura Benton
published
3.78
Janene Nordin
published
3.78
Michele Hall Craig
published
3.63
Margot Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Correna Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Natalie Deel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Leigh Gleason
published
3.56
Emily Elison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Wesley Fuller
published
3.37
Ellen Flautt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Jennifer Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Rosa Luttrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Paige Troutman
published
3.23
Jodie Campbell
published
3.13
Lori Barrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Benton + Margot Dunn6255% games+1.5% vs expected
Michele Hall Craig + Paige Troutman3356% games−4.2% vs expected
Janene Nordin + Margot Dunn224 matchesnot enough data
Lori Barrett + Rosa Luttrell314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Collins + Rosa Luttrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Thompson
19W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Laura Benton
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Janene Nordin
24W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Michele Hall Craig
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Margot Dunn
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Correna Dickson
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Natalie Deel
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Leigh Gleason
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Wesley Fuller
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ellen Flautt
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jennifer Collins
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Rosa Luttrell
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Paige Troutman
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jodie Campbell
33W–16L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lori Barrett
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.