Teams

Morley, Maslow/Troccoli-D

2022 65&Over Women · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-22vs Huntington, Woods-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Troccoli / Marie Thomas vs Joan Tedesco / Coleen Gussaroff1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Bracco / Carol Tricoles vs Andrea Woods / Betsy Radecki0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Patricia Spencer vs Kathleen MacEiko / Deborah Kolomick2-6, 1-6
2022-08-17vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Bracco / Marie Thomas vs Janice Matthews / Jane Muller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Tricoles / Barbara Kearney vs Vicki Glover / Ann Marie MacDonald1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Patricia Spencer vs Nancy Johnson / Patricia Molloy7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2022-08-12vs Huntington, Woods-DLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Troccoli / Marie Thomas vs Coleen Gussaroff / Betsy Radecki6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Spencer / Linda Bracco vs Andrea Woods / Deborah Dreher0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Melanie Raskin vs Nancy Ambrosio / Kathleen MacEiko1-6, 1-6
2022-08-01vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Linda Bracco vs Kathleen Houghtaling / Ginny McGowan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Pellechia / Barbara Kearney vs Ann Marie MacDonald / Maureen Cornacchia3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Spencer / Dale McCann vs Leslie Wecksler / Dale Conway0-6, 3-6
2022-07-22vs Huntington, Woods-DLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Troccoli / Marie Thomas vs Coleen Gussaroff / Andrea Woods2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Kearney / Carol Tricoles vs Betsy Radecki / Deborah Dreher6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Linda Bracco vs Cathleen Callahan / Kathleen MacEiko3-6, 1-6
2022-07-18vs Huntington, Woods-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Troccoli / Marie Thomas vs Andrea Woods / Joan Tedesco4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Tricoles / Zoya Roizman vs Deborah Kolomick / Betsy Radecki2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Marion Horowitz vs Cathleen Callahan / Nancy Ambrosio2-6, 2-6
2022-07-13vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Troccoli / Marie Thomas vs Ginny McGowan / Jane Muller6-4, 5-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Raskin / Patricia Spencer vs Leslie Wecksler / Nancy Rosenthal2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Tricoles / Peggy Maslow vs Nancy Johnson / Dale Conway4-6, 3-6
2022-06-20vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 02
L#2 DoublesLinda Bracco / Jean Tanklowitz vs Maureen Cornacchia / Janice Matthews1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Marion Horowitz vs Ann Marie MacDonald / Patricia Molloy3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Karen Terzano
published 3.5
Barbara Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Peggy Maslow
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.71
Andrea Clouser
published 3
2.57
Diane Pellechia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Linda Bracco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Carol Tricoles
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Dale McCann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Tanklowitz
published
Martha Troccoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Zoya Roizman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Bracco + Peggy Maslow21035% games−13.5% vs expected
Carol Tricoles + Barbara Kearney1732% gamesnot enough data
Linda Bracco + Zoya Roizman4158% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Spencer + Peggy Maslow0531% gamesnot enough data
Linda Bracco + Diane Pellechia134 matchesnot enough data
Martha Troccoli + Peggy Maslow123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Tricoles + Peggy Maslow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Terzano
52W–65L career · type A · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Barbara Kearney
6W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Peggy Maslow
30W–77L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Andrea Clouser
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Diane Pellechia
27W–75L career · 1 line in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Linda Bracco
126W–204L career · 6 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Carol Tricoles
29W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%68%32%
2.44
Dale McCann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jean Tanklowitz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Troccoli
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Spencer
3W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zoya Roizman
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.