Teams

Huntington, Woods-D

2022 65&Over Women · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-22vs Morley, Maslow/Troccoli-DWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Tedesco / Coleen Gussaroff vs Martha Troccoli / Marie Thomas6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Woods / Betsy Radecki vs Linda Bracco / Carol Tricoles6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen MacEiko / Deborah Kolomick vs Peggy Maslow / Patricia Spencer6-2, 6-1
2022-08-12vs Morley, Maslow/Troccoli-DWon 21
L#1 DoublesColeen Gussaroff / Betsy Radecki vs Martha Troccoli / Marie Thomas4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Woods / Deborah Dreher vs Patricia Spencer / Linda Bracco6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Ambrosio / Kathleen MacEiko vs Peggy Maslow / Melanie Raskin6-1, 6-1
2022-08-08vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DWon 21
L#1 DoublesColeen Gussaroff / Joan Tedesco vs Debra Paquette / Ginny McGowan1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dreher / Deborah Kolomick vs Kathleen Houghtaling / Vicki Glover6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathleen Callahan / Kathleen MacEiko vs Nancy Johnson / Dale Conway6-4, 6-1
2022-07-27vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Tedesco / Andrea Woods vs Ginny McGowan / Janice Matthews2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesColeen Gussaroff / Betsy Radecki vs Nancy Rosenthal / Leslie Wecksler6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Ambrosio / Kathleen MacEiko vs Jane Muller / Arethia Williams3-6, 1-6
2022-07-25vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Tedesco / Andrea Woods vs Janice Matthews / Debra Paquette3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Radecki / Deborah Kolomick vs Arethia Williams / Ginny McGowan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Dreher / Kathleen MacEiko vs Patricia Molloy / Nancy Rosenthal7-5, 2-5
2022-07-22vs Morley, Maslow/Troccoli-DWon 21
W#1 DoublesColeen Gussaroff / Andrea Woods vs Martha Troccoli / Marie Thomas6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBetsy Radecki / Deborah Dreher vs Barbara Kearney / Carol Tricoles4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathleen Callahan / Kathleen MacEiko vs Peggy Maslow / Linda Bracco6-3, 6-1
2022-07-18vs Morley, Maslow/Troccoli-DWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Woods / Joan Tedesco vs Martha Troccoli / Marie Thomas6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Betsy Radecki vs Carol Tricoles / Zoya Roizman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathleen Callahan / Nancy Ambrosio vs Peggy Maslow / Marion Horowitz6-2, 6-2
2022-06-13vs LI: GC Rec., Cornacchia/Johnson-DLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathleen Callahan / Andrea Woods vs Arethia Williams / Ginny McGowan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Kathleen MacEiko vs Kathleen Houghtaling / Debra Paquette3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Tedesco / Cora Brettler vs Vicki Glover / Patricia Molloy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Coleen Gussaroff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Joan Tedesco
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Deborah Dreher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Andrea Woods
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.64
Deborah Kolomick
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Betsy Radecki
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen MacEiko
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Nancy Ambrosio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Coleen Gussaroff + Andrea Woods31041% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Ambrosio + Betsy Radecki4446% gamesnot enough data
Coleen Gussaroff + Betsy Radecki4359% gamesnot enough data
Joan Tedesco + Coleen Gussaroff4160% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Woods + Betsy Radecki2346% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Woods + Deborah Dreher224 matchesnot enough data
Joan Tedesco + Andrea Woods123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Coleen Gussaroff
40W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Joan Tedesco
19W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Deborah Dreher
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3.5
Andrea Woods
25W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.98
3
Deborah Kolomick
59W–150L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Betsy Radecki
24W–21L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen MacEiko
9W–14L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Ambrosio
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.