Teams

Dore/128s/5.5/BC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 8 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Morgan Dore
Sep 15 9:00 AM
Beau Chene Country Club
Sep 22 9:00 AM
Beau Chene Country Club
Sep 29 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Morgan Dore
Oct 6 9:00 AM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 13 9:00 AM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 20 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Morgan Dore
2026-09-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrittanie Stevens / Kaitlyn Greenleaf vs Sarah Robin / Catherine Davenport4-6, 2-6
2026-08-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDecember Best / Kaitlyn Greenleaf vs Rebecca Landry / Jennifer Steen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green/18s/5.5/PAC2051438
2Nash/18s/5.5/SC1133857
3Dore/128s/5.5/BC02151062

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Brittanie Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Brittany MacMaster
usually #1 Singles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
December Best
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.70
Caroline Larussa
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
Amber Tomaszewski
published 2.5
Ashley Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Elise MacMaster
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
KK Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kaitlyn Greenleaf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Hodgins
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Kelly Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Lea Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Lori Rase
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Morgan Dore
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Olivia Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Entzel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tiffany Hitdlebaugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Toni Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Rase + Toni Shepherd4349% gamesnot enough data
Brittany MacMaster + Katherine Hodgins5157% gamesnot enough data
Morgan Dore + Kelly Wallace2442% gamesnot enough data
Lori Rase + Kelly Wallace033 matchesnot enough data
Brittany MacMaster + Toni Shepherd123 matchesnot enough data
Toni Shepherd + Brittanie Stevens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittanie Stevens
13W–7L career · type S · 11 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Brittany MacMaster
23W–14L career · 17 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
December Best
5W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Caroline Larussa
9W–11L career · 13 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Amber Tomaszewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Stephens
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elise MacMaster
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
KK Gordon
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kaitlyn Greenleaf
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
25W–18L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Wallace
9W–45L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lea Johnson
18W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Rase
22W–27L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Morgan Dore
8W–21L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Simpson
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Entzel
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tiffany Hitdlebaugh
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Toni Shepherd
31W–24L career · 36 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.