Teams

Nash/18s/5.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming
Sep 8 9:00 AM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 15 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Kristen Nash
Sep 22 9:00 AM
Beau Chene Country Club
Sep 29 9:00 AM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 6 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Kristen Nash
Oct 13 9:00 AM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 20 9:00 AM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green/18s/5.5/PAC2051438
2Nash/18s/5.5/SC1133857
3Dore/128s/5.5/BC02151062

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Alexis Shih
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 39% · published 3
Allison Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Danielle Hufft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.57
Catherine Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.07
Anna Pou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jenny Vitellaro
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jessica Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kasey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Kathy Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Muller Clinton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kristen Nash
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lacey Schwab
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Michelle Branighan
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roberta Baker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Sarah Robin
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SHELLY GALLARDO + Roberta Baker1446% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Michelle Branighan224 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + SHELLY GALLARDO033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Catherine Davenport123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Davenport + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Vitellaro + Danielle Hufft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Shih
14W–9L career · type S · 18 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Danielle Hufft
19W–27L career · 19 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Catherine Davenport
6W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Anna Pou
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jenny Vitellaro
20W–28L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Hollister
17W–7L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kasey Moore
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Farrow
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Muller Clinton
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Nash
4W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lacey Schwab
40W–11L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Branighan
7W–17L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberta Baker
7W–20L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 41 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Robin
7W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bullock
17W–41L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.