Teams

GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Tan/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Johnson/55&over/8.0W63171025236
2GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Shannon/NMSU63161126240
3GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Lobato/EPTC#145111638284
4GEPTA/55&over/8.0W/Tan/EPTC#327101736246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Adriana Aldrete
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Elena Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ernestina Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Estela Loy
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Gabriela Stoiber
usually #1 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Gloria Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Hope Perez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
MarieJosee Lefebvre
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Selena Solis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Tina Gute
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Yolanda Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Perez + MarieJosee Lefebvre121150% games+2.6% vs expected
Jeanette Tan + MarieJosee Lefebvre131551% games+0.7% vs expected
Estela Loy + Yolanda Miranda4247% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Lori DeLisser5070% gamesnot enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser1442% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Yolanda Miranda314 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Jeanette Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Estela Loy + Lori DeLisser314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 15 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Adriana Aldrete
32W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Elena Sandoval
18W–15L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ernestina Herrera
12W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Estela Loy
67W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriela Stoiber
63W–57L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria Gomez
60W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hope Perez
40W–44L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeanette Tan
36W–51L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Lore
83W–74L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
MarieJosee Lefebvre
100W–76L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Gute
74W–62L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yolanda Miranda
60W–53L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.