Teams

LATA40/Anderson/CAMP

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Turner / Jenny Burden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-01vs LATA40-Henderson-LCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Turner / Beverly Campbell vs Eric Holt / Jan Bigg7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs LATA40/Mathews/SSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Turner / Angel Roddy vs Vishal Gupta / Cindy Bane2-6, 6-7
2025-06-10vs LATA40/Sutton/SSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenny Burden / Michael Turner vs Wanda Pipes / Calvin Mccoy6-3, 6-2
2025-06-05vs LATA40/Coyle/LCTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Turner / Anne Belue vs Nitin Jain / Jaime Soblesky6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Angel Roddy
published 4
3.40
Brannon Hagins
published 3.5
3.25
Michael Turner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Anderson
published 3.5
3.17
Larry Ellisor
published
3.11
Beverly Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.10
Libby Hagins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Anne Belue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Jenny Burden
published
Michael Guffee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brannon Hagins + Libby Hagins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angel Roddy
92W–65L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brannon Hagins
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Michael Turner
112W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jeffrey Anderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Ellisor
30W–35L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Beverly Campbell
52W–16L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Libby Hagins
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Anne Belue
48W–21L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jenny Burden
21W–29L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Michael Guffee
52W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ranjith Sundararajan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.