Teams

UPTA18A/Brown/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Men - 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs UPTA18A/Pandya/HollytreeWon 32
L#1 DoublesStephen Brown / Jonah Chitwood vs Brian Bartlett / Hunter Yarborough1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Wells vs Thomas Koehler0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackson Dozier / Matthew Jacques vs Raj Pandya / Stewart Austin7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesCassius Hossfeld vs Chase Kasper6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCory Gillespie / Benjamin Aikens vs Joshua Childs / Harry Reed3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs UPTA18A/Ko/GCCLost 13
L#1 DoublesJackson Dozier / Jonah Chitwood vs John Jennings / Timothy Stewart7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Aikens vs Christopher Loveless6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCory Gillespie / Luke Wells vs Sidney Mitchell / Jeff Powell6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Brown / Cassius Hossfeld vs John Ko / Clayton Jennings1-6, 5-7
2025-04-05vs UPTA18A/Englisbe/SportsClubLost 13
W#1 DoublesCory Gillespie / Duncan Hogg vs Jason Englisbe / Sloan Garrett6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCassius Hossfeld / Kainen Leer vs William Braun / Bill Derocha2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBenjamin Aikens vs Benjamin McFarland1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJackson Dozier / Ryan Polk vs Derek Manet / Kenneth Kolakowski6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-30vs UPTA18A/Pandya/HollytreeLost 05
L#1 DoublesLuke Wells / Jonah Chitwood vs Brian Bartlett / Hunter Yarborough1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJackson Dozier vs William Henderson5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCory Gillespie / Clay Lollis vs Scott Schmeissing / Stewart Austin5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBenjamin Aikens vs Thomas Koehler3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDuncan Hogg / Patrick Rosopa vs Joshua Childs / Chase Kasper3-6, 0-6
2025-03-15vs UPTA18A/Ko/GCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDuncan Hogg / Clay Lollis vs John Ko / John Jennings7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLuke Wells vs Walter Frye7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Aikens vs Sidney Mitchell6-3, 6-2
2025-03-08vs UPTA18A/Englisbe/SportsClubLost 23
L#1 DoublesLuke Wells / Cory Gillespie vs Jason Englisbe / William Braun5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Aikens vs Sloan Garrett5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCassius Hossfeld / Stephen Brown vs Benny Walker / Latif Alam7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Dozier vs Kenneth Kolakowski2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHunter Gray / Matthew Jacques vs Derek Manet / Kevin Reardon7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Luke Wells
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Cassius Hossfeld
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Benjamin Aikens
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Jackson Dozier
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.16
Duncan Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Matthew Jacques
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Clay Lollis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Cory Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.91
Ryan Polk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Joshua Churchill
published
3.78
Kainen Leer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Patrick Rosopa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jonah Chitwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson Dozier + Matthew Jacques6164% games+12.8% vs expected
Cassius Hossfeld + Luke Wells224 matchesnot enough data
Cory Gillespie + Duncan Hogg314 matchesnot enough data
Cory Gillespie + Luke Wells213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Wells
19W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
4.5
Cassius Hossfeld
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Benjamin Aikens
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Jackson Dozier
34W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Duncan Hogg
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
Matthew Jacques
26W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.13
4.5
Clay Lollis
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Cory Gillespie
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
Ryan Polk
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
Joshua Churchill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.79
Kainen Leer
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Patrick Rosopa
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jonah Chitwood
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.