Teams

Ruru Tri 4.5

2022 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-11vs Serve 'em Up!Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Watanabe / Irene Ma vs Junko Kadomatsu / Jenna Young4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-28vs Triple The FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Nicole Imanaka vs Akiko Oshiro / Mineko Szkotak7-5, 6-3
2022-08-20vs Serve 'em Up!Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Nicole Imanaka vs Colleen Oshiro / Jenna Young6-3, 6-4
2022-08-06vs Triple The FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Imanaka / Erin Mitsuyoshi vs Nikki Morimoto / Akiko Oshiro1-6, 2-6
2022-07-30vs Serve 'em Up!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Mitsuyoshi / Caasi Nakasone vs Jenna Young / Junko Kadomatsu0-6, 4-6
2022-07-16vs Triple The FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesEan Smith / Irene Ma vs Ashley Cabral / Shannon Rogers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-09vs Serve 'em Up!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Watanabe / Ean Smith vs Jenna Young / Colleen Oshiro6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-25vs Triple The FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaasi Nakasone / Nicole Imanaka vs Ashley Cabral / Shannon Rogers6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ruru Tri 4.55353870
2Serve 'em Up!44441066
3Triple The Fun35351176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Irene Ma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
Peggy Watanabe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Caasi Nakasone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Nicole Imanaka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Ean Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Erin Mitsuyoshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Holly Toguchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Watanabe + Caasi Nakasone8166% games+16.3% vs expected
Peggy Watanabe + Ean Smith5159% games−3.1% vs expected
Peggy Watanabe + Erin Mitsuyoshi123 matchesnot enough data
Caasi Nakasone + Nicole Imanaka303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Irene Ma
28W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Peggy Watanabe
255W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Caasi Nakasone
135W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Nicole Imanaka
19W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Ean Smith
54W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Erin Mitsuyoshi
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Holly Toguchi
86W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.