Teams

TTA PURPLE

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs LTA REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Templeton / Karen Gallo vs TOMOKO WATANABE / Carla Dewey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Horace / Julie Aragon vs Kathleen Murphy / Sandy Wheaton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Shaw / Betty Evans vs Larissa Ebert / Jan DeBruin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-24vs ARCA BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Everson / Kelly Horace vs Shelley Lopez / Mary Ann Gralka6-3, 6-1
2022-06-17vs BCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Aragon / Karen Gallo vs CAROLYN PAUL / Annette Wright6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Kelly Horace vs Susan Cooper / Tricia Dessel6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnne Shaw / Michelle Templeton vs Josephine Warfield / Laura Studebaker1-6, 2-6
2022-06-10vs CVTA PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Karen Gallo vs Julia Garza / Nancy Johnson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Everson / Kelly Horace vs Gloria Vera / Mary T Nickerson4-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Bennett / Anne Shaw vs Patricia Irwin / Amy Edwards6-1, 7-5
2022-06-09vs ARCA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Aragon / Karen Gallo vs Linda Ceccanti / Sharon Brown6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Michelle Templeton vs Mary Ann Gralka / Carmen Valdes6-1, 6-2
2022-06-03vs RCC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetty Evans / Anne Shaw vs Diane Misgen / Patricia Sato3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Everson / Kelly Horace vs Pam Decker / Beth Saperstein3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Julie Aragon vs Ann Marie White / Karen Stuckemeyer4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-05-27vs LTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Horace / Christine Everson vs Carla Dewey / Patty Orban2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Karen Gallo vs Jan DeBruin / Mary Ellen O'Rell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Bennett / Betty Evans vs Kathleen Murphy / TOMOKO WATANABE2-6, 5-7
2022-05-13vs BCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Karen Gallo vs Annette Wright / CAROLYN PAUL5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Horace / Christine Everson vs Dana Heather / Lauren Christin3-6, 1-6
2022-05-06vs CVTA PINKWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Everson / Kelly Horace vs Amy Edwards / Nancy Geyer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetty Evans / Linda Bennett vs Mary T Nickerson / Ann Harsh6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Julie Aragon vs Patricia Irwin / Jaclyn Swan6-3, 6-2
2022-04-29vs RCC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Julie Aragon vs Pam Decker / Beth Saperstein3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Everson / Kelly Horace vs Diane Misgen / Paula Yantorno6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Karen Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.73
Tammi Chiappone
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.58
Julie Aragon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Christine Everson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.42
Kelly Horace
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.39
Michelle Templeton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Betty Evans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Anne Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Aragon + Tammi Chiappone5650% games−2.5% vs expected
Christine Everson + Kelly Horace194442% games−5.7% vs expected
Michelle Templeton + Tammi Chiappone6261% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Templeton + Karen Gallo314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Gallo + Tammi Chiappone314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Gallo + Kelly Horace314 matchesnot enough data
Tammi Chiappone + Kelly Horace404 matchesnot enough data
Christine Everson + Karen Gallo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Gallo
199W–136L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Tammi Chiappone
91W–91L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Julie Aragon
37W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Christine Everson
38W–67L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Kelly Horace
81W–107L career · 9 lines in 2022
0%73%27%
2.42
3
Michelle Templeton
54W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
2.5
Betty Evans
31W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Anne Shaw
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Bennett
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.