Teams

RCC YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-02vs BCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Kirsten Coppo vs Annette Wright / Laura Studebaker2-6, 3-6
2022-07-01vs CVTA PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Patricia Sato vs Jodi Ansell / Jaclyn Swan5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Cadden / Ann Marie White vs Nancy Geyer / Nancy Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Misgen / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Cindy Goldrich / Patricia Irwin6-2, 6-2
2022-06-17vs LTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Kirsten Coppo vs Kathleen Murphy / Patty Orban4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Mary Ellen O'Rell / Larissa Ebert6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Pam Zaeske vs TOMOKO WATANABE / Linda Hattel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-10vs ARCA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Sharon Brown / Sharon Gordon6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Sato / Kirsten Coppo vs Mary Ann Gralka / Shelley Lopez6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Misgen / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Christine Russell / Skeeter Buck6-4, 6-2
2022-06-03vs TTA PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Patricia Sato vs Betty Evans / Anne Shaw6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Christine Everson / Kelly Horace6-3, 6-3
2022-05-27vs CVTA PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Gloria Vera / Ann Harsh0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Kirsten Coppo vs Nancy Geyer / Amy Edwards3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Sato / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Nancy Johnson / Patricia Irwin6-2, 6-3
2022-05-20vs BCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Susan Cooper / Debbie Day3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Misgen / Patricia Sato vs Richelle Burnett / Dana Heather6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Paula Yantorno vs CAROLYN PAUL / Laura Studebaker4-6, 3-6
2022-05-13vs LTA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Diane Misgen vs Kathleen Murphy / Jan DeBruin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPaula Yantorno / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Carla Dewey / Patty Orban0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sato / Pam Zaeske vs Larissa Ebert / Mary Ellen O'Rell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-06vs ARCA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Patricia Sato vs Linda Ceccanti / Sharon Brown6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie White / Paula Yantorno vs Skeeter Buck / Iris Shaw6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Atkinson / Karen Stuckemeyer vs Carmen Valdes / Sharon Gordon6-1, 6-1
2022-04-29vs TTA PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Tammi Chiappone / Julie Aragon6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Misgen / Paula Yantorno vs Christine Everson / Kelly Horace3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Ann Marie White vs Anne Shaw / Linda Bennett7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Diane Misgen
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.79
Beth Saperstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Kirsten Coppo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Ann Marie White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Anne Cadden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Karen Stuckemeyer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Pam Decker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Zaeske
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Sato
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Yantorno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Atkinson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Stuckemeyer + Anne Cadden12460% games+7.2% vs expected
Patricia Sato + Diane Misgen6354% games+5.3% vs expected
Beth Saperstein + Pam Decker12954% games−2.9% vs expected
Kirsten Coppo + Ann Marie White2547% games−6.1% vs expected
Kirsten Coppo + Pam Zaeske224 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Coppo + Anne Cadden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Misgen
83W–75L career · 11 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Beth Saperstein
35W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Kirsten Coppo
48W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Ann Marie White
31W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Anne Cadden
36W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
0%74%26%
2.42
Karen Stuckemeyer
44W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Pam Decker
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Zaeske
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Sato
32W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Yantorno
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Atkinson
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.