Teams

Huberdeau

2026 Auburn USTA Adult 18 & Over Spring League · 3.5 Adult Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-05vs McClellanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevan Bizilia / Matt Ehrie vs Drew Mauldin / Christopher Graff4-6, 1-6
2026-02-19vs McClellanLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoe Wilkinson / Matt Ehrie vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / David Welesko0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKiedong Lim vs Jeremy Samolesky1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLamar Daniels III / Scott Cullins vs Lee Bryan / Chang Hyun Park6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid McGuirt / Karl Rayborn vs Drew Mauldin / John Tran1-6, 0-6
2026-02-12vs McClellanWon 21
W#1 DoublesHenry Huberdeau / Zach Tantillo vs Jeffrey McClellan / Jeremy Samolesky6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLamar Daniels III vs Mohamed Eldemerdash1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesScott Cullins / Scott Simpson vs John Tran / Christopher Graff6-3, 6-0
2026-01-29vs McClellanLost 04
L#1 DoublesLamar Daniels III / Scott Simpson vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / David Welesko2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDavid McGuirt vs Chang Hyun Park0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarl Rayborn / Kiedong Lim vs Jeffrey McClellan / Jeremy Samolesky1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevan Bizilia / Joe Wilkinson vs David Hester / Mark Murphy6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jeff Blevins
published
3.28
Scott Cullins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Henry Huberdeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lamar Daniels III
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.96
Matt Ehrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Karl Rayborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
David McGuirt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.55
Joe Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Kiedong Lim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Zach Tantillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevan Bizilia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Blevins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
Scott Cullins
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
Henry Huberdeau
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Lamar Daniels III
21W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Matt Ehrie
47W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Karl Rayborn
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3.5
David McGuirt
3W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.69
Joe Wilkinson
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kiedong Lim
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Zach Tantillo
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kevan Bizilia
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.