Teams

McClellan

2026 Auburn USTA Adult 18 & Over Spring League · 3.5 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-05vs HuberdeauWon 10
W#1 DoublesDrew Mauldin / Christopher Graff vs Kevan Bizilia / Matt Ehrie6-4, 6-1
2026-02-19vs HuberdeauWon 31
W#1 DoublesMohamed Eldemerdash / David Welesko vs Joe Wilkinson / Matt Ehrie6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJeremy Samolesky vs Kiedong Lim6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLee Bryan / Chang Hyun Park vs Lamar Daniels III / Scott Cullins3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrew Mauldin / John Tran vs David McGuirt / Karl Rayborn6-1, 6-0
2026-02-12vs HuberdeauLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey McClellan / Jeremy Samolesky vs Henry Huberdeau / Zach Tantillo4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMohamed Eldemerdash vs Lamar Daniels III6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Tran / Christopher Graff vs Scott Cullins / Scott Simpson3-6, 0-6
2026-01-29vs HuberdeauWon 40
W#1 DoublesMohamed Eldemerdash / David Welesko vs Lamar Daniels III / Scott Simpson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChang Hyun Park vs David McGuirt6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeffrey McClellan / Jeremy Samolesky vs Karl Rayborn / Kiedong Lim6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Hester / Mark Murphy vs Kevan Bizilia / Joe Wilkinson7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McClellan2184874

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Mohamed Eldemerdash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Chang Hyun Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
David Welesko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Drew Mauldin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Jeffrey McClellan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Lee Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jeremy Samolesky
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.92
Christopher Graff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.54
David Hester
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mohamed Eldemerdash + Drew Mauldin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mohamed Eldemerdash
28W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Chang Hyun Park
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
David Welesko
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Drew Mauldin
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Jeffrey McClellan
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Lee Bryan
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Jeremy Samolesky
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3.5
Christopher Graff
2W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
David Hester
7W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.