Teams

FGrindle (WSRC)

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs JMorse/RTownsend (JCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBART AUSTIN / Jeremy Ritter vs Jeffrey Kuykendal / John Haviland2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Dichak / Frank Grindle vs RONALD TOWNSEND / Roger Gaines6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTano Failla / Dana Haake vs Jeff Morse / Kevin Woods6-4, 6-1
2025-07-16vs AHunt (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFrank Grindle / Vladislav Valtsis vs Chris Lucas / Bryant Barnhardt6-1, 6-1
2025-07-08vs AHunt (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Joseph Dichak vs Bryant Barnhardt / David Whiteman6-2, 6-3
2025-07-02vs JMorse/RTownsend (JCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Dichak / Vladislav Valtsis vs Greg Hobby / Roger Gaines1-6, 0-6
2025-06-11vs JMorse/RTownsend (JCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeremy Ritter / Rishi Kapur vs John Haviland / Jeffrey Kuykendal2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVladislav Valtsis / Joseph Dichak vs Mark Timmes / Michael Stier6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrad Lucas / Tano Failla vs William Roork / Rob Owen5-7, 2-6
2025-06-04vs AHunt (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDhruv Bhatt / Joseph Dichak vs Bryant Barnhardt / Todd Kasler6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jeremy Ritter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
BART AUSTIN
published 4
3.60
Rishi Kapur
published
3.45
Frank Grindle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Vladislav Valtsis
published
3.12
Dana Haake
published 3.5
3.10
Dwayne Trantham
published
3.01
Tano Failla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brad Lucas
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Grindle + Joseph Dichak8850% games−4.0% vs expected
Joseph Dichak + Tano Failla5347% gamesnot enough data
Frank Grindle + Dana Haake213 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Ritter + Rishi Kapur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeremy Ritter
61W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
BART AUSTIN
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Rishi Kapur
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Frank Grindle
99W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Vladislav Valtsis
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dana Haake
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Dwayne Trantham
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Tano Failla
53W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Brad Lucas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.