Teams

CSRC CARPENTER

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-31vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Siegel / Susan Wilklow vs Jane Corral / Deb Shipwash3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-24vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 02
L#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Shinobu Voss2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Stephanie Brock vs Salome D'Silva / Chantel Rosario2-6, 4-6
2021-05-17vs PBTC HENSONWon 10
W#3 DoublesRoni Schlagel / Candace McCollett vs Linda Sanchez / Alyssa Parga6-4, 6-3
2021-05-10vs MEMPK MCCARRONLost 01
L#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Susan Lozanov6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-26Won 10
W#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Stephanie King6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Alexia Hignett2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Nancy Siegel
published
3.67
Patty Carpenter
published
3.65
Candace McCollett
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.44
Susan Wilklow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephanie Brock
published
Kristen Lange
published
Margaret Gullickson
published
Roni Schlagel
published
Sandra Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roni Schlagel + Nancy Siegel281058% games+5.0% vs expected
Sandra Cook + Patty Carpenter81345% games−1.9% vs expected
Patty Carpenter + Nancy Siegel3445% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Siegel
83W–46L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Patty Carpenter
46W–60L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Susan Wilklow
18W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
Stephanie Brock
57W–29L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristen Lange
26W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Gullickson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roni Schlagel
50W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Cook
24W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.