Teams

MEMPK MCCARRON

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-24vs PBTC HENSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Gorthy / Kayla Breedlove vs Rochelle Beier-Kemmet / Julie Larson1-6, 4-6
2021-05-23vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Irons / Nancy Barker vs Deb Shipwash / Amy Jones6-4, 6-1
2021-05-10vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Stefanie McCarron vs Roni Schlagel / Nancy Siegel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKirsten Matheson / Amanda Irons vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange3-6, 5-7
2021-05-04vs PBTC HENSONWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Jeannette Ortiz / Linda Sanchez7-6, 6-3
2021-04-26vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Lozanov / Kayla Breedlove vs Judy Kaltenbacher / Jennifer Madden7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Nancy Barker
published
3.81
Stefanie McCarron
published
JESSEE BARLOW
published 4
3.66
Cheryl Gorthy
published 4
3.65
Angela Sullivan
published 4
3.60
Kayla Breedlove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.17
Amanda Irons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Kirsten Matheson
published
Susan Lozanov
published
Teena Crum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Breedlove + Nancy Barker2448% games+3.1% vs expected
Cheryl Gorthy + Angela Sullivan10946% games−6.1% vs expected
Kayla Breedlove + Cheryl Gorthy2351% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Barker + Amanda Irons3249% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Gorthy + JESSEE BARLOW134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
116W–48L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
Stefanie McCarron
68W–50L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
JESSEE BARLOW
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Cheryl Gorthy
25W–27L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Angela Sullivan
33W–28L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Kayla Breedlove
43W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Kirsten Matheson
14W–23L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.81
Susan Lozanov
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Teena Crum
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.