Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW9.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-26vs TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta vs Cynthia Abel / Kim Lackey4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Maral / Lisa Snowden vs Kristen Stanton / Christine Tennant3-6, 2-6
2026-03-23vs TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesElaine Hennessy / Lisa Maral vs Andrea Barnes / Paula Moser4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Hotchkiss / Kal Peters vs Cecilia Arnold / Kim Lackey1-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta vs Leslie Airola-Murveit / Andrea Barnes4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Hennessy / Marilyn Morrell-Kristal vs Kristen Stanton / Cynthia Abel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKarin Deas / Lisa Hotchkiss vs Sally Cella / Lynn Stanghellini1-6, 2-6
2026-02-26vs TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesElaine Hennessy / Lisa Snowden vs Amy Rennert / Christine Tennant0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Hotchkiss / Lisa Maral vs Kathleen Haigood / Beth McCarthy3-6, 2-6
2026-02-12vs TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta vs Leslie Airola-Murveit / Cynthia Abel4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Hennessy / Lisa Snowden vs Lynn Stanghellini / Karla Barnette6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Maral / Marilyn Morrell-Kristal vs Kathleen Haigood / Beth McCarthy1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0A6114715133
2VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW9.0A1612041250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lisa Snowden
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Beth Hostetler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Kal Peters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Elaine Hennessy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Thea Horii
published
3.85
Kathleen Larragueta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Dolores Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Karin Deas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Hotchkiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Maral
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Hostetler + Kathleen Larragueta1439% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Hennessy + Dolores Schmidt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Snowden
10W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Beth Hostetler
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Kal Peters
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Elaine Hennessy
7W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
Thea Horii
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
Kathleen Larragueta
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.85
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
1W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.70
Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.35
Karin Deas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hotchkiss
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Maral
5W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.