Teams

TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesCynthia Abel / Kim Lackey vs Beth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Stanton / Christine Tennant vs Lisa Maral / Lisa Snowden6-3, 6-2
2026-03-23vs VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW9.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Barnes / Paula Moser vs Elaine Hennessy / Lisa Maral6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCecilia Arnold / Kim Lackey vs Lisa Hotchkiss / Kal Peters6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLeslie Airola-Murveit / Andrea Barnes vs Beth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Stanton / Cynthia Abel vs Elaine Hennessy / Marilyn Morrell-Kristal6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSally Cella / Lynn Stanghellini vs Karin Deas / Lisa Hotchkiss6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAmy Rennert / Christine Tennant vs Elaine Hennessy / Lisa Snowden6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Haigood / Beth McCarthy vs Lisa Hotchkiss / Lisa Maral6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLeslie Airola-Murveit / Cynthia Abel vs Beth Hostetler / Kathleen Larragueta6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Stanghellini / Karla Barnette vs Elaine Hennessy / Lisa Snowden4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Haigood / Beth McCarthy vs Lisa Maral / Marilyn Morrell-Kristal6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TIBURON PEN C 65AW9.0A6114715133
2VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW9.0A1612041250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Kathleen Haigood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.40
Leslie Airola-Murveit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Christine Tennant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Cecilia Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Andrea Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Paula Moser
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.18
Lynn Stanghellini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Amy Rennert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Sally Cella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Cynthia Abel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Beth McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Karla Barnette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Lackey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Stanton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Barnes + Leslie Airola-Murveit7076% gamesnot enough data
Sally Cella + Lynn Stanghellini224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Haigood
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
Leslie Airola-Murveit
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Christine Tennant
31W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Cecilia Arnold
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Andrea Barnes
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Paula Moser
10W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
Lynn Stanghellini
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Amy Rennert
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Sally Cella
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Cynthia Abel
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Beth McCarthy
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
Karla Barnette
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.71
Kim Lackey
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Stanton
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.