GEPTA/55&over/8.0MX/Maese/EPTC#2

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09

Linda Haycraft

usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

4.00

Claudia Calderon

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

3.90

Mike Caldarella

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

3.30

Cesar Damian Carlos

usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

3.22

Daniel Martinez

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

—

Jose Maese

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Kraig White

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published —

—

Lori DeLisser

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Ricky Azar

published —

—

Rossana Roacho

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Selena Solis

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published —

—

Timothy Vida

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published —

—

Vanessa White

usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossana Roacho + Selena Solis	2–8	46% games	+13.4% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Claudia Calderon	4–1	59% games	not enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser	1–4	42% games	not enough data
Vanessa White + Kraig White	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Rossana Roacho + Lori DeLisser	3–1	4 matches	not enough data
Kraig White + Jose Maese	0–4	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Linda Haycraft

152W–76L career · 17 lines in 2026

27%73%<1%

4.09

4.5

Claudia Calderon

41W–57L career · 15 lines in 2026

51%49%<1%

4.00

—

Mike Caldarella

41W–40L career · 15 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

3.90

3.5

Cesar Damian Carlos

88W–92L career · 22 lines in 2026

2%91%8%

3.30

3.5

Daniel Martinez

25W–41L career · 25 lines in 2026

6%92%2%

3.22

—

Jose Maese

46W–64L career · 18 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kraig White

17W–55L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lori DeLisser

94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ricky Azar

14W–5L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rossana Roacho

123W–115L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Selena Solis

96W–102L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Timothy Vida

10W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Vanessa White

11W–32L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.