Teams

CCOC COLEMAN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Vanryzin / Julia Hershey vs Lisa Martin / Judy Mitchell6-1, 7-5
2025-07-11vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Hershey / Maura Houston vs Lisa Bischoff / Elizabeth Wood6-0, 6-4
2025-07-03vs CSCC RHODESLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Maura Houston vs Sutton Spanton / Erin Rhodes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColleen Cameron vs Lori Bayne5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Shannon Leifer vs Jennifer Gonzales / Mary Beth Yockey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarishah Erickson / Mary Simmons vs Lou Ann McClendon / Diane Burton6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-26vs LTFCS WISNERWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Vanryzin / Julia Hershey vs Diane Fredell / Jennifer Carpenter6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Shannon Leifer vs Linda Edgar / Jane Wisner6-2, 6-4
2025-06-19vs FLYHS COUTURELost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Julia Hershey vs Kady Brown / Kristi Couture3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Nina Ballenger vs Lori Littleford / Kim Young6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-12vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Vanryzin / Maura Houston vs Emily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Shannon Leifer vs Rebecca VanBuskirk / Judy Mitchell7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Julia Hershey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Carol Joslin
published 3.5
3.46
Marishah Erickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Colleen Cameron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Leifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Tracy Coons
published
3.25
Mary Vanryzin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Blair Carter
published 3.5
3.22
Mary Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
published
3.19
Kolsie Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Joy Farmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Janet Luce
published
Maura Houston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Ballenger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Coons + Kelsey Hunt4158% games+9.1% vs expected
Kolsie Coleman + Blair Carter224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Simmons + Mary Vanryzin213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Simmons + Kelsey Hunt123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Vanryzin + Joy Farmer123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Vanryzin + Tracy Coons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julia Hershey
39W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Carol Joslin
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Marishah Erickson
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Colleen Cameron
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Shannon Leifer
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tracy Coons
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Mary Vanryzin
50W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Blair Carter
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary Simmons
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kolsie Coleman
49W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Joy Farmer
14W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Janet Luce
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Maura Houston
37W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nina Ballenger
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.