Teams

PBTC MITCHELL

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs CCOC COLEMANLost 01
L#1 SinglesJessica Kepler vs Colleen Cameron1-6, 4-6
2025-07-10vs CSCC RHODESWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca VanBuskirk vs Christi Andress3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Kepler / Helen Arnold vs Lori Bayne / Sutton Spanton4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Henson / Gail MacKin vs Diane Burton / Lou Ann McClendon2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-03vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Kepler / Helen Arnold vs Wen Huang / Xiaohong Zhang6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-26vs FLYHS COUTURESplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Judy Mitchell vs Kristi Couture / Lori Littleford7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Kepler / Geepress Corpuz vs Courtney Wonnacott / Sheri Ford6-4, 7-5
2025-06-12vs CCOC COLEMANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio vs Mary Vanryzin / Maura Houston3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Kepler / Helen Arnold vs Janet Luce / Kelsey Hunt6-2, 1-0
2025-06-05vs CSCC RHODESWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio vs Erin Rhodes / Christi Andress7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca VanBuskirk vs Mary Beth Yockey6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Kepler / Helen Arnold vs Lori Bayne / Diane Scott2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Emily Vidmar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Lynette di Stasio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Jessica Kepler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Gail MacKin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Cawlfield
published 3.5
3.19
Geepress Corpuz
published
2.73
Helen Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Henson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca VanBuskirk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette di Stasio + Emily Vidmar8166% games+8.3% vs expected
Emily Vidmar + Jessica Kepler4353% games+5.5% vs expected
Helen Arnold + Jessica Kepler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Vidmar
71W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lynette di Stasio
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Jessica Kepler
28W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Gail MacKin
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Amy Cawlfield
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Geepress Corpuz
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Helen Arnold
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.73
Paula Henson
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca VanBuskirk
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.