Teams

Sorrow

2025 NOGTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Winter · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-03-09vs HendersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelley Finnell / Janet Lawrence vs Raquel Riesco / April Chambers1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs DeAnn Rauth / Kari Martin6-0, 6-2
2025-03-02vs GeethadeviWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Rauch / Laura Ketcham vs Tara McFarlane / Jewel Akpose6-0, 6-3
2025-02-23vs AndersenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Rauch / Ashley Sorrow vs Renee McClanahan / Kate Rolen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Larson / Terri Brunvoll vs Deborah Nation / Caroline Morrow6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLucynda Cynda Holmes / Cielene Aleksejus vs Melissa Shipp / April Totherow0-6, 2-6
2025-02-18vs HendersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Benton / Terri Brunvoll vs Carla Fain / April Chambers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Michelle Rauch vs DeAnn Rauth / Kari Martin6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelley Finnell / Janet Lawrence vs Janet Lovelady / Connie Corbin6-4, 6-0
2025-02-09vs GeethadeviLost 02
L#1 DoublesKennisha Cann / Amy Weathers vs Tara McFarlane / Jenni Johnson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Sorrow / Michelle Rauch vs Rekha Geethadevi / Elizabeth Morgan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-02vs TigarWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Weathers / Laura Ketcham vs Kimberly Conner / Caroline Bentley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-02vs AndersenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Benton / Kelley Finnell vs Deborah Nation / Tiffany Laird7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Ashley Sorrow vs Renee McClanahan / Caroline Morrow7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJana Henson / Terri Brunvoll vs Betty Andersen / April Totherow2-6, 4-6
2025-01-29vs GeethadeviSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Weathers / Kennisha Cann vs Angie Paulson / Jan Hair6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStacy Sorrow / Michelle Rauch vs Jewel Akpose / Elizabeth Morgan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-26vs HendersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Weathers / Cielene Aleksejus vs Holly Williams / Raquel Riesco6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Kelley Finnell vs Jessica Carter / April Chambers6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Larson / Terri Brunvoll vs DeAnn Rauth / Kari Martin6-2, 6-2
2025-01-17vs AndersenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnita Decosimo / Ashley Sorrow vs Renee McClanahan / Kate Rolen5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJana Henson / Kelley Finnell vs Melissa Shipp / Caroline Morrow4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLucynda Cynda Holmes / Cielene Aleksejus vs Katie Sanders / Tiffany Laird4-6, 3-6
2025-01-12vs TigarLost 02
L#2 DoublesJulie Briggs / Amy Weathers vs Susan Crum / Marialice Hatch6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Robinson / Michelle Rauch vs Lisa Govan / Sharel Hooper6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Amy Weathers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Michelle Rauch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Anita Decosimo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Ashley Sorrow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Cielene Aleksejus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Janet Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jana Henson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Kelley Finnell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Linda Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Brunvoll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Weathers + Michelle Rauch3451% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Sorrow + Cielene Aleksejus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Weathers
43W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Michelle Rauch
19W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Anita Decosimo
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ashley Sorrow
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cielene Aleksejus
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Janet Lawrence
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jana Henson
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Kelley Finnell
2W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Linda Benton
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Brunvoll
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.