Teams

SFV Rooftop Ballers

2022 Adult 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Jimmy Nguyen vs Scott Conroy / Steve Oetomo2-6, 3-6
2022-06-05vs SFV Toluca LakersWon 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Siegel / Robert Chiler vs Kenji Thielstrom / Gonzalo Suarez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-22vs SFV AV StormersLost 01
L#2 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Robert Chiler vs Carlos Guarin / Ray del Rosario6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-07vs SFV The 300'sLost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Siegel / Jimmy Nguyen vs Eric Schaefer / MacLyn McRae0-6, 1-6
2022-05-01vs SFV Grill’s DeucebagsLost 02
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Robert Chiler vs Todd Snyder / Nigel Beckmeier1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Siegel / Robert Fox vs Robert Clark / Darren Chu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-16vs SFV Dance With the DevilSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeepak Antony / Garen Amirganian vs James Ordway / Alain Banas4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Fox / Greg Siegel vs Russell Baingo / Donald Spadoni6-3, 4-4
2022-04-09vs SFV BadlandsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Deepak Antony vs Dan Bronson / Jozsef Feher5-7, 5-7
2022-04-03vs SFV DominatorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Mark Gasper vs RIO NINO GOMEZ / Michael Quiros0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeepak Antony / Greg Siegel vs TEVIN JENKINS / Anurag Anand1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Delia Holguin
published 4
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.52
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.29
Greg Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.19
Mark Gasper
published
2.93
Dennis Alfelor
published 3.5
Serge Makov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garen Amirganian + Greg Siegel11551% games−7.2% vs expected
Mark Gasper + Deepak Antony033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Delia Holguin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Greg Siegel
173W–158L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
Dennis Alfelor
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.93
Serge Makov
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.