Teams

SFV Dominators

2022 Adult 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-05vs SFV AV StormersWon 10
W#1 SinglesJared Mano vs Carlos Guarin6-2, 6-1
2022-05-15vs SFV Warner BallersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBurke Franklin vs Bushra Abdelmalak3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJared Mano / Mauricio Muller vs Daniel Hernandez / Jake Bregman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesLee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01vs SFV The 300'sLost 01
L#3 DoublesJared Mano / Won Cho vs Gary Weinzimer / Dan Genud0-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs SFV Dance With the DevilLost 01
L#2 DoublesBurke Franklin / David Berkowitz vs Russell Baingo / Jeff Eisenberg7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-03vs SFV Rooftop BallersWon 20
W#2 SinglesBurke Franklin vs Warren Mendes6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON vs Dennis Alfelor / Serge Makov6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
TEVIN JENKINS
published 4.5
3.97
Jared Mano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.74
Timothy Chun
published
3.73
Anurag Anand
published 4
3.72
Won Cho
published
3.47
Burke Franklin
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Jose MacKinney
published
3.31
Lee Tsai
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
RIO NINO GOMEZ
published
RUBEN SIMON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Won Cho + Timothy Chun3260% games+4.0% vs expected
Jared Mano + Burke Franklin2350% gamesnot enough data
Jared Mano + Lee Tsai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
Jared Mano
91W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Timothy Chun
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Anurag Anand
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Won Cho
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Burke Franklin
157W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jose MacKinney
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
RIO NINO GOMEZ
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
RUBEN SIMON
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.