Teams

Canyon Creek/Swim W3.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs The Lakes/Frazier W3.0TWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsey Pineyro / Chantelle Chandler vs Alta Frazier / Shana Halliwell6-1, 6-1
2026-06-18vs Northwood/Newton-Dove W3.0TLost 02
L#1 DoublesChantelle Chandler / Jennifer McDaniel vs Ashley Newton / Sarah Catalano4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Monnat / Abbie Kauffman vs Molly Cain / Katie Napper2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-11vs High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0TWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Schardt / Lindsey Pineyro vs Clara Hernandez / Suzanne Friend6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChantelle Chandler / Lori Steenken vs Sherri Spruill / Melissa Holland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsay Monnat / Abbie Kauffman vs Edna Williamson / Laney LaCorte6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-29vs Lakewood/Dorff-Harrison W3.0TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheridan Lang / Lindsey Pineyro vs Kellie Spillman / Kate Dorff6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAbigail Luby / Abbie Kauffman vs Genniva Bruce / Michelle Rehberger6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-28vs Brookhaven/Younts-Dorsey W3.0TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Schardt / Abigail Luby vs Julie Wetzel / Courtney Younts3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Pineyro vs Sarah Tchoukaleff6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-07vs Huffhines/Grandle W3.0TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Pineyro / Abigail Luby vs Lillian Webb / Emily Goodin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChantelle Chandler / Sherry Clemens vs Lori Kjeldgaard / Lindsay Cleland5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAbigail Luby / Lindsey Pineyro vs Julie Berg / Cheri Rion7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings45 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBarM/OGrady W3.0T8034619240
2Cooper FC/Martin W3.0T8032823287
3DCC/Taylor-Bennett W3.0T80291129267
4Stonebridge Ranch/Martin-Jordan W3.0T71271334311
5Huffhines/Grandle W3.0T62281227285
6Wilkerson-Sanders/Gardner-Watson W3.0T62281228303
7DAC/Farrell-Elliott W3.0T62261434307
8Lakewood/Dorff-Harrison W3.0T62231737289
9Canyon Creek/Swim W3.0T62241643362
10JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.0T53261432302
11Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0T53261435327
12Lakes at Castle Hills/Springer-Schneekloth W3.0T53241641361
13Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.0T53211943337
14Fretz/Seely-Watlington W3.0T53221847385
15High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0T44261435305
16Stonebriar/Boyd-Francis W3.0T44211939313
17Wagon Wheel/Hayes W3.0T44221842358
18Samuell Grand/Neblett-McGuirk W3.0T44202042356
19Lifetime Frisco/Merrifield-Arfa W3.0T44221843353
20Fretz/Roshto-Morrow W3.0T44202043336
21Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T44221843373
22Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0T44211944373
23DAC/Peters-Irons W3.0T44202044326
24Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T44202046340
25Lakes at Castle Hills/Howard-Te W3.0T44202047344
26Stonebridge Ranch/Flock-Saunders W3.0T44192148369
27Samuell Grand/Mallory W3.0T44182248380
28Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.0T44182253362
29The Lakes/Frazier W3.0T44162456399
30North Texas RC/Garcia W3.0T44172356382
31Brookhaven/Younts-Dorsey W3.0T35231735302
32Spring Park/Nolen Red W3.0T35202049366
33The Nelson/Galjour W3.0T35182249381
34Northwood/Newton-Dove W3.0T35182250371
35The Nelson/Arnold-Kinskey W3.0T35192150353
36Spring Park/Nolen Blue W3.0T35182250356
37Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0T35142655395
38Wilkerson-Sanders/Smart-Sutton W3.0T26142656402
39RGAC/Dopkins W3.0T26132757400
40Chandlers Landing/Hilliard-Brummett W3.0T26112963424
41Huffhines/Stout W3.0 T17103065433
42Prestonwood/Prescott-Micek W3.0T1773368441
43Greenhill/Berde W3.0T1763472462
44High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0T0893164425
45The Lakes/Falke-Johnson W3.0T0883266439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Chantelle Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Lindsey Pineyro
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.87
Monica Miles
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Leanne Moore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Abigail Luby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Lindsay Schardt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Elizabeth Ryan
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Emily Swim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.68
Christy Gadoci
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Amy Castro
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.60
Sherry Clemens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.56
Abbie Kauffman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Lori Steenken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Chloe Aduddell
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.30
Kristie Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Lindsay Monnat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sheridan Lang
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Schardt + Emily Swim6356% games+7.4% vs expected
Lindsey Pineyro + Amy Castro6256% games+6.3% vs expected
Chantelle Chandler + Lori Steenken224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Pineyro + Lindsay Schardt404 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Pineyro + Abigail Luby224 matchesnot enough data
Christy Gadoci + Emily Swim123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Ryan + Kristie Walsh033 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Walsh + Emily Swim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chantelle Chandler
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lindsey Pineyro
19W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Monica Miles
16W–19L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Leanne Moore
15W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Abigail Luby
3W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lindsay Schardt
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Elizabeth Ryan
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Emily Swim
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Christy Gadoci
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Amy Castro
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Sherry Clemens
6W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Abbie Kauffman
3W–6L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Lori Steenken
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Chloe Aduddell
6W–5L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Kristie Walsh
7W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Lindsay Monnat
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheridan Lang
25W–2L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.