Teams

Lakes at Castle Hills/Howard-Te W3.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0TLost 12
W#1 DoublesKara Conway / Janice Varkey vs Elizabeth Chalfant / Angela Batra7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHillary Gallego / Mai Schaefer vs Kyla Coots / Shannon Piper4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTica Taylor / Lisa Johnson vs Amanda Toussaint / Susan Long3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHillary Gallego / Mai Schaefer vs Natalie Hatchett / Abby Egan6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-05vs RGAC/Dopkins W3.0TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJanice Varkey / Melissa McDade vs Jennifer Dopkins / Ellen Palmer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTica Taylor / Lacey Wostal vs Melissa Pearson / Shelley Weidenbach6-7, 0-6
2026-05-28vs The Nelson/Galjour W3.0TWon 20
W#2 DoublesLiza Howard / Mai Schaefer vs Grace Evans / Michelle Miller6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTica Taylor / Janice Varkey vs Kristi Stacy / Kaori Mitsuhashi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-22vs DCC/Taylor-Bennett W3.0TLost 01
L#3 DoublesKara Conway / Mai Schaefer vs Meredith Finney / Heidi Pickens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs Greenhill/Berde W3.0TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLiza Howard / Melissa McDade vs Jessica Thomas / Jenia Turner6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMai Schaefer vs Cecilia Martinez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-08vs Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0TLost 01
L#3 DoublesMai Schaefer / Jillian Teague vs Jen Vroonland / Andrea Herrod5-7, 4-6
2026-05-07vs JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.0TLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lane / Janice Varkey vs Andrea Detz / Michelle McArtor3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings45 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBarM/OGrady W3.0T8034619240
2Cooper FC/Martin W3.0T8032823287
3DCC/Taylor-Bennett W3.0T80291129267
4Stonebridge Ranch/Martin-Jordan W3.0T71271334311
5Huffhines/Grandle W3.0T62281227285
6Wilkerson-Sanders/Gardner-Watson W3.0T62281228303
7DAC/Farrell-Elliott W3.0T62261434307
8Lakewood/Dorff-Harrison W3.0T62231737289
9Canyon Creek/Swim W3.0T62241643362
10JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.0T53261432302
11Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0T53261435327
12Lakes at Castle Hills/Springer-Schneekloth W3.0T53241641361
13Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.0T53211943337
14Fretz/Seely-Watlington W3.0T53221847385
15High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0T44261435305
16Stonebriar/Boyd-Francis W3.0T44211939313
17Wagon Wheel/Hayes W3.0T44221842358
18Samuell Grand/Neblett-McGuirk W3.0T44202042356
19Lifetime Frisco/Merrifield-Arfa W3.0T44221843353
20Fretz/Roshto-Morrow W3.0T44202043336
21Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0T44221843373
22Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0T44211944373
23DAC/Peters-Irons W3.0T44202044326
24Greenhill/Savelli W3.0T44202046340
25Lakes at Castle Hills/Howard-Te W3.0T44202047344
26Stonebridge Ranch/Flock-Saunders W3.0T44192148369
27Samuell Grand/Mallory W3.0T44182248380
28Samuell Grand/Saunders-Bricker W3.0T44182253362
29The Lakes/Frazier W3.0T44162456399
30North Texas RC/Garcia W3.0T44172356382
31Brookhaven/Younts-Dorsey W3.0T35231735302
32Spring Park/Nolen Red W3.0T35202049366
33The Nelson/Galjour W3.0T35182249381
34Northwood/Newton-Dove W3.0T35182250371
35The Nelson/Arnold-Kinskey W3.0T35192150353
36Spring Park/Nolen Blue W3.0T35182250356
37Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0T35142655395
38Wilkerson-Sanders/Smart-Sutton W3.0T26142656402
39RGAC/Dopkins W3.0T26132757400
40Chandlers Landing/Hilliard-Brummett W3.0T26112963424
41Huffhines/Stout W3.0 T17103065433
42Prestonwood/Prescott-Micek W3.0T1773368441
43Greenhill/Berde W3.0T1763472462
44High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0T0893164425
45The Lakes/Falke-Johnson W3.0T0883266439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Thao Te
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.01
Kalee Pair
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.93
Allison Ludwig
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Liza Howard
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Janice Varkey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Angie Alumbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Melissa McDade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Mai Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Jillian Teague
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Gina Emadi-Karp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Tica Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hillary Gallego
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Lacey Wostal
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mai Schaefer + Jillian Teague3259% gamesnot enough data
Mai Schaefer + Hillary Gallego314 matchesnot enough data
Liza Howard + Allison Ludwig213 matchesnot enough data
Mai Schaefer + Allison Ludwig303 matchesnot enough data
Angie Alumbaugh + Thao Te303 matchesnot enough data
Angie Alumbaugh + Kalee Pair213 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Wostal + Jillian Teague213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thao Te
18W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kalee Pair
16W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Allison Ludwig
15W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Liza Howard
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Janice Varkey
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Angie Alumbaugh
17W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Melissa McDade
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Mai Schaefer
19W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jillian Teague
12W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Gina Emadi-Karp
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
Tica Taylor
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Hillary Gallego
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lacey Wostal
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.