Teams

Team Forman1 (Kendalltown)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-02-03vs Pino (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Fishman / Tracie Williams vs Gina Bruce / Soledad Pochat4-6, 2-6
2021-01-27vs Longa (Salvadore Park)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMaricarmen Diazmiron vs Elisabeth Eljuri6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Fishman / Tracie Williams vs Taria Dabby / Janet Sanchez6-4, 6-2
2021-01-20vs Team Forman2 (Kendalltown)Won 20
W#1 SinglesMaricarmen Diazmiron vs Ana Veloso6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ruiz Velasco / Tania Rodriguez vs Jane Levitz / Mellissa Cili6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-01-13vs Miami-Dade - Shula's/MagoulasWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaricarmen Diazmiron / Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco vs Mirthescka Escanellas / Cecilia Pissane6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Fishman / Tracie Williams vs Yuliet Pellegrini / Rebeca Scorza6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Maira Maguire
published 4.5
3.81
Judy Prado
published 4
3.64
Maricarmen Diazmiron
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Karen Fishman
published
3.49
Monica Pardo
published
3.29
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.25
3.18
Tania Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Forman
published
Tracie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Rodriguez + Maricarmen Diazmiron281259% games−9.4% vs expected
Maricarmen Diazmiron + Judy Prado1637% gamesnot enough data
Judy Prado + Maira Maguire4359% gamesnot enough data
Tania Rodriguez + Tracie Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maira Maguire
129W–107L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Maricarmen Diazmiron
249W–150L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Karen Fishman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
3.57
Monica Pardo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
Tania Rodriguez
93W–41L career · 1 line in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracie Williams
196W–131L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.