Teams

Esplanade - Teberg

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-09vs Bonita National - S. FlaggWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Wall / Karen Shelar vs Jane Doe / Anne Pellon3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-02vs Players Club /ComboGirls - HarperSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerry Hammer / Jill Teberg vs Rhonda Lombardi / Mary Ellen Iles6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Wall / Karen Shelar vs Betty Hayes / Linda Wallace1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLeslie Martin / Terry Hammer vs Dawn Cooper / Donna Burns6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDoris Wedemann / Karen Shelar vs Vicki Cooper / Claudette Workman6-2, 6-0
2023-02-16vs The Glades - J KellyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDoris Wedemann / Karen Shelar vs KASSIE KESSINGER / Marianna Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-02vs Grey Oaks - ArchieLost 01
L#1 DoublesLanette Disera-Geissler / Terry Hammer vs Susan Aldrich / Joan Stolberg6-7, 1-6
2023-01-26vs Quail West - SeeseLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Shelar / Debbie Garson vs Kim Swope Schott / Lori Zubyk2-6, 0-6
2023-01-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Hammer / Karen Shelar vs Gay Kronen / Christine Kriss1-6, 4-6
2023-01-12vs Island Walk - SchmidtWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Teberg / Karen Shelar vs Linda Orlich / Fran Zisman6-2, 6-4
2023-01-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Hammer / Debbie Garson vs Dodie Gallagher / Doris Duignan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Janet Krusen
published 3.5
3.14
Leslie Martin
published
3.07
Jill Teberg
published
3.07
Terry Hammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Haewon Feltsman
published 3.5
3.04
Karen Shelar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Debbie Garson
published 3.5
Doris Wedemann
published
Nannette Cassidy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Teberg + Leslie Martin2446% games+4.0% vs expected
Jill Teberg + Terry Hammer044 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Martin + Terry Hammer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Krusen
157W–103L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Leslie Martin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Jill Teberg
5W–20L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Terry Hammer
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Haewon Feltsman
44W–24L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Karen Shelar
65W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Debbie Garson
38W–43L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Doris Wedemann
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lanette Disera-Geissler
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nannette Cassidy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.