Teams

300/McVay

2026 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs HCC/JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Plankenhorn / Rachael Seidler vs Tracy Giordano / Kelly Haager2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSue Bruegger / Anacielo Vale-grogan vs Bailey Lerner / Ann Redfern4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLiana Moreno / Gabriela Ladd vs Majken Hoh / Elizabeth Laconi4-6, 0-6
2026-08-29vs 300/WimsettLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Frankenberger / Mary Plankenhorn vs Tiffany Scalf / Mary Mccue1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachael Seidler / Anacielo Vale-grogan vs Iryna Zasimovich / Ashley Chalouhi0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGabriela Ladd / Megan Mcvay vs Krista Smith / Marly Wilson7-5, 7-5
2026-08-28vs HCC/JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Montauk / Anita Frankenberger vs Margot Maurer / Jamie Gilliam1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNatasha Seavers / Anacielo Vale-grogan vs Kristin O'Connor / Bailey Lerner3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVirginia Connors / Gabriela Ladd vs Sheena Jones / Majken Hoh4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anita Frankenberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Plankenhorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Laura Montauk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Natasha Seavers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Rachael Seidler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Sue Bruegger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Anacielo Vale-grogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.16
Virginia Connors
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Megan Mcvay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Liana Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita Frankenberger
68W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Mary Plankenhorn
26W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Laura Montauk
99W–157L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
Natasha Seavers
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–124L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Sue Bruegger
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Anacielo Vale-grogan
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.31
Virginia Connors
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Megan Mcvay
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Liana Moreno
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.