Teams

HCC/Jones

2026 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-28vs 300/McVayWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargot Maurer / Jamie Gilliam vs Laura Montauk / Anita Frankenberger6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin O'Connor / Bailey Lerner vs Natasha Seavers / Anacielo Vale-grogan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheena Jones / Majken Hoh vs Virginia Connors / Gabriela Ladd6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Tracy Giordano
published 3.5
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Alison Safir
published 3
2.94
Kristin O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Ann Redfern
published 3
Bailey Lerner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Diana Butler
published 3
2.30
Mary Hazan
published
2.27
Sheena Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Majken Hoh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Laconi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheena Jones + Mary Hazan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracy Giordano
71W–23L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Alison Safir
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kristin O'Connor
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Ann Redfern
39W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Bailey Lerner
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Diana Butler
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Mary Hazan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Sheena Jones
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Majken Hoh
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Elizabeth Laconi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.