← Teams

CGM-Peters

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.32 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Robert Palena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Andrea Kropp
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Karl Kropp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
ALFREDO ALANIS
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
ROSY ALANIS
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Tomoko Langworthy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results7 ties
2020-02-29Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAndrea Kropp / Karl Kropp vs Robin Browne / Elliott Gansner1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / ROSY ALANIS vs Cathryn Todd / Joe Malboeuf5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2020-02-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJon Peters / Trish Peters vs Jeff Welter / Robin Welter6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Palena / Heidi Palena vs Monte Gonzales / Patricia Eargle7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Tomoko Langworthy vs Paul Blankenmeister / Linda Blankenmeister6-2, 6-3
2020-02-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Tamara Phillips vs Andrew Kohlmetz / Colleen Walker1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKarl Kropp / Barbara Pasmore vs Michelle Boucher / Brad Mathewson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / ROSY ALANIS vs Julie LaMontagne / Isaac Navarro4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2020-02-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTrish Peters / Jon Peters vs Andrew Kohlmetz / Julie LaMontagne4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTomoko Langworthy / Mike Olson vs Dana Austin / Isaac Navarro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-02-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJohn McCarthy / Tamara Phillips vs Kayla Casebeer / Michael Sullivan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeidi Palena / Robert Palena vs Jeri Finn / Brendan Finn7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Trish Peters vs Rachel Young / Fenn Bourland6-0, 6-1
2020-01-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS vs Jeri Finn / Fenn Bourland6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Palena / Heidi Palena vs Rachel Young / Michael Sullivan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Andrea Kropp vs Kayla Casebeer / Brian Hefele6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2020-01-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTomoko Langworthy / Mike Olson vs Frank Brown / Megan Clifford6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn McCarthy / Tamara Phillips vs Chigozie Muoto / Erin Doucet6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Barbara Pasmore vs Brian Taylor / Laura Taylor6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Robert Palena
24W–22L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Andrea Kropp
51W–81L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Jon Peters
33W–36L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Karl Kropp
11W–28L career
4%94%2%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
ALFREDO ALANIS
35W–53L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3
ROSY ALANIS
43W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Tomoko Langworthy
50W–68L career
7%93%0%
2.65
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.