Teams

TOC.Leahy

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-23vs TOC.ShuklaLost 12
W#1 DoublesCecily Peterson / Sally Willert vs Tracy Lowrance / Liza Terll6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaureen Green / Lisa Swank vs Kimberly Latzy / Amber Bruner2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberley Ashmore / Angela Ehland vs Marina Barthalmus / Sabrina Kane3-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs TOC.ShuklaLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Angela Ehland vs Angela Baxley / Rita Burgess2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLuAnn Eyerman / Lisa Mason vs Miho Ogura / Amber Bruner2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Leahy / Cecily Peterson vs Marina Barthalmus / Smita Shukla7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Zana Piric
published 3.5
3.13
Holly Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Swank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Keely Williams
published 3
2.88
LuAnn Eyerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Sally Willert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Angela Ehland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Maureen Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Stefanie Raysich
published 3
2.60
Kimberley Ashmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Lisa Mason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Jennifer Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Raysich + Lisa Swank5254% games+1.6% vs expected
Lisa Mason + LuAnn Eyerman123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Ehland + LuAnn Eyerman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Holly Atkinson
252W–179L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Lisa Swank
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Keely Williams
185W–157L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
LuAnn Eyerman
132W–112L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Sally Willert
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Angela Ehland
21W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Maureen Green
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Stefanie Raysich
72W–44L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kimberley Ashmore
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Lisa Mason
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Leahy
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.